Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a section on compatibility with OpenTracing to Compatibility doc #114

Closed
tigrannajaryan opened this issue Jun 12, 2019 · 5 comments · Fixed by #1101
Closed

Add a section on compatibility with OpenTracing to Compatibility doc #114

tigrannajaryan opened this issue Jun 12, 2019 · 5 comments · Fixed by #1101
Assignees
Labels
area:semantic-conventions Related to semantic conventions help wanted Extra attention is needed priority:p2 Medium priority level release:allowed-for-ga Editorial changes that can still be added before GA since they don't require action by SIGs spec:trace Related to the specification/trace directory
Milestone

Comments

@tigrannajaryan
Copy link
Member

tigrannajaryan commented Jun 12, 2019

We need a section on compatibility of OpenTelemetry with OpenCensus and OpenTracing and how the gradual transition for existing OpenCensus/OpenTracing users will be handled.

@SergeyKanzhelev SergeyKanzhelev added this to the API revision: 07-2019 milestone Jun 20, 2019
@iredelmeier iredelmeier added the needs discussion Need more information before all suitable labels can be applied label Jul 30, 2019
@SergeyKanzhelev SergeyKanzhelev modified the milestones: API revision: 07-2019, Alpha v0.4 Sep 27, 2019
@tedsuo
Copy link
Contributor

tedsuo commented Dec 4, 2019

@carlosalberto said he can tackle the OpenTracing side. Anyone from OpenCensus want to tackle that portion?

@tedsuo tedsuo added help wanted Extra attention is needed and removed needs discussion Need more information before all suitable labels can be applied labels Dec 4, 2019
@andrewhsu
Copy link
Member

from the spec sig mtg today, looks like this one would be more suited for v0.6 milestone

@arminru arminru modified the milestones: v0.5, v0.6 May 12, 2020
@bogdandrutu bogdandrutu added the spec:trace Related to the specification/trace directory label Jun 12, 2020
@bogdandrutu bogdandrutu added the area:semantic-conventions Related to semantic conventions label Jun 30, 2020
@carlosalberto carlosalberto added the release:required-for-ga Must be resolved before GA release, or nice to have before GA label Jul 2, 2020
@andrewhsu andrewhsu added the priority:p1 Highest priority level label Jul 17, 2020
@andrewhsu
Copy link
Member

Talked with @carlosalberto and this one should probably be split into 2: one for opentracing and one for opencensus.

@andrewhsu andrewhsu changed the title Add a section on compatibility with OpenCensus and OpenTracing to Compatibility doc Add a section on compatibility with OpenTracing to Compatibility doc Aug 7, 2020
@andrewhsu
Copy link
Member

From the bug triage meeting today, splitting out OpenCensus into separate issue #766

@bogdandrutu bogdandrutu added priority:p2 Medium priority level and removed priority:p1 Highest priority level labels Aug 10, 2020
@andrewhsu andrewhsu added release:allowed-for-ga Editorial changes that can still be added before GA since they don't require action by SIGs and removed release:required-for-ga Must be resolved before GA release, or nice to have before GA labels Sep 25, 2020
@andrewhsu
Copy link
Member

from the issue triage mtg today with TC, allowing changes related to this issue for GA if editorial changes only

TuckTuckFloof pushed a commit to TuckTuckFloof/opentelemetry-specification that referenced this issue Oct 15, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area:semantic-conventions Related to semantic conventions help wanted Extra attention is needed priority:p2 Medium priority level release:allowed-for-ga Editorial changes that can still be added before GA since they don't require action by SIGs spec:trace Related to the specification/trace directory
Projects
None yet
8 participants