Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Alternate data processing language #4499

Conversation

tigrannajaryan
Copy link
Member

This builds on top of #4444
but uses Python-like syntax instead of SQL-like.

This builds on top of open-telemetry#4444
but uses Python-like syntax instead of SQL-like.
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 1, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #4499 (1b4e4f6) into main (96a882a) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #4499   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   90.77%   90.77%           
=======================================
  Files         179      179           
  Lines       10412    10412           
=======================================
  Hits         9452     9452           
  Misses        743      743           
  Partials      217      217           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 96a882a...1b4e4f6. Read the comment docs.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 9, 2021

This PR was marked stale due to lack of activity. It will be closed in 7 days.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

This PR was marked stale due to lack of activity. It will be closed in 7 days.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 2, 2022

This PR was marked stale due to lack of activity. It will be closed in 14 days.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Jan 2, 2022
@bogdandrutu bogdandrutu removed the Stale label Jan 3, 2022
@tigrannajaryan
Copy link
Member Author

Closing in favour #4444

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants