Avatar in UserAutoComplete #8967
Conversation
Co-authored-by: noufalrahim <noufalrahim6784@gmail.com>
❌ Deploy Preview for care-ohc failed.
|
|
@Jacobjeevan the avatar is not available in the users dropdown |
Opened a PR on Backend 👍 Right now, it only works onQuery (provided user has an avatar). Adding the change to allow for cover image url available to treating_physician_object. |
WalkthroughThe changes involve enhancements to the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/components/Common/UserAutocompleteFormField.tsx (1)
Line range hint
1-1: Add documentation about avatar availability conditions.Since avatars are only available when certain conditions are met (as mentioned in PR comments), consider adding JSDoc comments to document these limitations for future maintainers.
+/** + * UserAutocomplete component that displays user information with avatars. + * Note: Avatars are only displayed when: + * 1. The user has an avatar configured + * 2. The backend provides the read_profile_picture_url + */ export default function UserAutocomplete(props: UserSearchProps) {src/components/Form/FormFields/Autocomplete.tsx (1)
245-272: Consider UI improvements for better accessibility and visual balance.While the implementation works, there are several opportunities for improvement:
- The avatar size (h-11 w-11) seems large for a dropdown item. Consider reducing it for better visual balance.
- Add aria-label to improve accessibility for screen readers.
- Consider adjusting focus styles for better contrast when avatars are present.
Here's a suggested improvement:
- <div className="flex flex-row gap-2"> + <div className="flex flex-row gap-2" aria-label={`User option: ${option.label}`}> {option?.image && ( <Avatar - className="h-11 w-11 rounded-full" + className="h-8 w-8 rounded-full" name={option.label} imageUrl={option.image} /> )} <div className="flex flex-grow flex-col"> <div className="flex justify-between"> - <span>{option.label}</span> + <span className="font-medium">{option.label}</span> <span>{option.icon}</span> </div>
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/components/Common/UserAutocompleteFormField.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/Form/FormFields/Autocomplete.tsx(7 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
src/components/Common/UserAutocompleteFormField.tsx (2)
Line range hint 82-87: Well-structured integration of the avatar feature.
The avatar integration follows the established patterns and maintains clean separation of concerns alongside other option properties.
83-83: Verify avatar URL handling in the Autocomplete component.
The implementation correctly passes the profile picture URL, but we should ensure proper handling of undefined URLs in the Autocomplete component.
✅ Verification successful
Avatar handling is properly implemented in the Autocomplete component
The implementation correctly handles undefined image URLs:
- The Autocomplete component uses the Avatar component which safely handles both defined and undefined image URLs
- The optionImage prop is properly typed as
OptionCallback<T, string | undefined> - The Avatar component is only rendered when
option?.imageexists - The component provides a fallback by using the user's name when the image URL is undefined
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the Autocomplete component handles undefined image URLs
ast-grep --pattern 'optionImage={$_} $$$' src/components/Form/FormFields/Autocomplete.tsx
Length of output: 91
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first check if the file exists and see its content
fd "Autocomplete.tsx" --type f
# Then let's examine the implementation details
rg -l "optionImage" --type typescript
Length of output: 254
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the Autocomplete component implementation
cat src/components/Form/FormFields/Autocomplete.tsx
# Also check the usage in UserAutocompleteFormField
cat src/components/Common/UserAutocompleteFormField.tsx
Length of output: 14152
src/components/Form/FormFields/Autocomplete.tsx (4)
17-17: LGTM: Clean type definitions for avatar support.
The new optionImage property follows the established pattern of option callbacks and properly handles cases where images might not be available.
Also applies to: 28-28, 55-55, 80-80
126-126: LGTM: Consistent option mapping implementation.
The image property is correctly mapped from the optionImage callback, maintaining consistency with other option properties.
146-146: LGTM: Proper handling of raw input options.
Correctly initializes image as undefined for raw input options, ensuring consistent behavior when users type custom values.
245-251: Verify avatar handling with backend integration.
Based on the PR comments mentioning that "avatar functionality currently only works on query", we should verify that this implementation properly handles cases where avatars might not be immediately available.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the Avatar component implementation to verify the handling of optional images.
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:
Avatar handling implementation is properly designed and safe
The implementation correctly handles cases where avatars might not be available:
- The Avatar component has proper null handling with optional
imageUrlprop - It gracefully falls back to showing initials when no image is provided
- UserAutocomplete safely passes the optional
read_profile_picture_urlto the Avatar component - The conditional rendering in the Autocomplete component (
option?.image) provides an additional safety layer
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for proper null handling of avatar/profile picture URLs across the codebase
# Look for profile picture URL handling patterns
echo "Checking profile picture URL handling patterns..."
rg "profile_picture_url|avatar_url" -A 3
# Look for Avatar component usage patterns
echo "Checking Avatar component usage patterns..."
ast-grep --pattern 'Avatar {
$$$
imageUrl={$_}
$$$
}'
Length of output: 2717
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check Avatar component implementation
echo "Checking Avatar component implementation..."
fd Avatar.tsx --exec cat {}
# Check for conditional rendering patterns around Avatar
echo "Checking conditional Avatar rendering patterns..."
ast-grep --pattern 'Avatar
$$$
{$_?.image && (
$$$
)}'
# Check UserAutocomplete implementation
echo "Checking UserAutocomplete implementation..."
fd UserAutocomplete --exec cat {}
Length of output: 7127
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/components/Form/FormFields/Autocomplete.tsx (1)
245-272: Consider UI refinements for better visual harmony.While the implementation is functionally correct and naturally handles the initials fallback through the Avatar component, consider these refinements:
- The avatar size (h-11 w-11) might be too large for a dropdown option. Consider using a smaller size like h-8 w-8 for better visual balance.
- Add vertical alignment to ensure the avatar aligns properly with the text.
- <div className="flex flex-row gap-2"> + <div className="flex flex-row items-center gap-2"> {(option?.image || props.avatar) && ( <Avatar - className="h-11 w-11 rounded-full" + className="h-8 w-8 rounded-full" name={option.label} imageUrl={option.image} /> )}
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/components/Common/UserAutocompleteFormField.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/Form/FormFields/Autocomplete.tsx(7 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- src/components/Common/UserAutocompleteFormField.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/components/Form/FormFields/Autocomplete.tsx (4)
17-17: LGTM! Type definitions are well-structured.
The addition of the optionImage prop follows the existing pattern of option callbacks and is consistently implemented across both AutocompleteFormFieldProps and AutocompleteProps.
Also applies to: 28-28, 55-55, 80-80
126-126: LGTM! Option mapping is consistent.
The image mapping follows the same pattern as other option properties, maintaining consistency in the codebase.
146-146: LGTM! Raw input handling is appropriate.
Setting image: undefined for raw input options is correct as these represent user-typed values without associated images.
246-251: Verify avatar visibility in dropdown.
Based on the PR comments mentioning that "avatar functionality currently only works on query", we should verify that avatars are consistently visible in the dropdown, not just during query operations.
|
👋 Hi, @Jacobjeevan, This message is automatically generated by prince-chrismc/label-merge-conflicts-action so don't hesitate to report issues/improvements there. |
|
@Jacobjeevan PR looks good to me, can you clear the conflicts |
|
@Jacobjeevan Do we need the changes in |
|
@bodhish It looks like pre-commit is sorting imports from |
|
Let's get it merged |
|
@Jacobjeevan Your efforts have helped advance digital healthcare and TeleICU systems. 🚀 Thank you for taking the time out to make CARE better. We hope you continue to innovate and contribute; your impact is immense! 🙌 |
Proposed Changes
@ohcnetwork/care-fe-code-reviewers
Merge Checklist
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Style
Chores