Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove compensation factor to adjust extra time according to time control #5730

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

FauziAkram
Copy link
Contributor

Remove the compensation factor to adjust extra time according to time control, as it's no longer bringing benefit.
P.s: When introduced it was also tested at 180+1.8, so let me know if an additional test at this TC is needed.

Passed STC:
LLR: 2.93 (-2.94,2.94) <-1.75,0.25>
Total: 102752 W: 26712 L: 26566 D: 49474
Ptnml(0-2): 395, 11713, 26950, 11987, 331
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/67630eb286d5ee47d9543420

Passed LTC:
LLR: 2.94 (-2.94,2.94) <-1.75,0.25>
Total: 67284 W: 17133 L: 16962 D: 33189
Ptnml(0-2): 24, 7133, 19184, 7250, 51
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/6763fe0686d5ee47d9543d2b

bench: 934447

Copy link

clang-format 18 needs to be run on this PR.
If you do not have clang-format installed, the maintainer will run it when merging.
For the exact version please see https://packages.ubuntu.com/noble/clang-format-18.

(execution 12429824112 / attempt 1)

@xu-shawn
Copy link
Contributor

I believe that VLTC testing is needed as the original patch did not pass LTC

@FauziAkram
Copy link
Contributor Author

FauziAkram commented Dec 20, 2024

@Disservin Disservin added the simplification A simplification patch label Dec 22, 2024
@FauziAkram FauziAkram closed this Dec 24, 2024
@xu-shawn
Copy link
Contributor

maybe it would be beneficial to add some comments there to indicate the non-linear scaling, similar to what we have in SE and LMR code

@FauziAkram
Copy link
Contributor Author

@xu-shawn Yes, I was also thinking so, but unfortunately, lately, disservin is ignoring the PRs related to comments. So I don't know. I guess will try later, lets' see.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
simplification A simplification patch
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants