-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix #27 - Support for OCaml 4.08 #26
Conversation
Currently the 4.08 is not passing. I'll merge the 4.07 change, and then we should fix 4.08 before enabling the CI for it. (This means you might have to rebase your PR to fix the conflict with the 4.07 one, sorry.) |
Surely, no problem, it is trivial change anyway. |
Build should be restarted/retriggered now, the ppx_deriving was updated. |
Thanks for importing the fix here. I would be happy to merge if the CI agree, and then can work on releasing a new version. |
@gasche it is for |
I don't think that works.
In a record pattern |
Apparently
Update: Lol, my bad, didn't notice the field names are different |
Well I guess you also need to name the field at which the sub-record |
This one solved, but there are more. Will continue tomorrow locally, seems no easy one-line blind fix. Sorry for the noise, thought lazy GitHub pencil edit would solve this. |
@gasche ok, now it is green and ready. |
@gasche can you please take a look? I think it is ready to be merged |
Is there anything that should be done to get this merged? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Apologies for the delay and thanks for the pings from time to time. This isn't quite ready but the high-level plan is of course to get it merged eventually, and then make a release.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems good to merge when CI agrees, thanks! (Minor comment inline.)
Seems Travis is dead. You might want to restart failed jobs. |
I restarted some jobs; note that the 4.05 failure is real:
|
Ok, now everything is green, except Travis own failure on 4.05 (can be restarted). |
Thanks! Merged. |
Would be nice to make a release after that. |
(See #29 for the release-preparation thread.) |
No description provided.