Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

frontend: Focus text entry in NameDialog #11839

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Warchamp7
Copy link
Member

Description

Sets the focused widget to the QLineEdit in NameDialog widgets.

Motivation and Context

Want the text entry field to be focused when these dialogs are created.

I think this was already the case in past versions, unsure when the regression happened and if it was our fault or Qts.

How Has This Been Tested?

Opened Profile and Scene Collection New/Rename/Duplicate dialogs

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Tweak (non-breaking change to improve existing functionality)

Checklist:

  • My code has been run through clang-format.
  • I have read the contributing document.
  • My code is not on the master branch.
  • The code has been tested.
  • All commit messages are properly formatted and commits squashed where appropriate.
  • I have included updates to all appropriate documentation.

@Warchamp7 Warchamp7 changed the title UI: Focus text entry in NameDialog frontend: Focus text entry in NameDialog Feb 7, 2025
@Warchamp7 Warchamp7 force-pushed the collection-name-dialog-focus branch from e841082 to 9ba6095 Compare February 7, 2025 00:16
@WizardCM WizardCM added Bug Fix Non-breaking change which fixes an issue UI/UX Anything to do with changes or additions to UI/UX elements. labels Feb 12, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Bug Fix Non-breaking change which fixes an issue UI/UX Anything to do with changes or additions to UI/UX elements.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants