Set Nutanix CCM cipher-suites to fix sweet32 CVE

[tuxtof]

What this PR does / why we need it:

Enforce specific tls-cipher-suite to fix Nutanix CCM SWEET32 CVE

Release note:

- Fix Nutanix CCM Sweet32 issue

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 30.62%. Comparing base (dc98d5e) to head (5908af1).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #439   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   30.62%   30.62%           
=======================================
  Files          14       14           
  Lines        1342     1342           
=======================================
  Hits          411      411           
  Misses        931      931           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[thunderboltsid]

/lgtm
/approve

[deepakm-ntnx]

just for completeness, could you please document where did this list come from? and in future how should one keep it up to date.
also how is this tested?

[nutanix-cn-prow-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: deepakm-ntnx, thunderboltsid, tuxtof

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [deepakm-ntnx,thunderboltsid,tuxtof]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[tuxtof]

just for completeness, could you please document where did this list come from? and in future how should one keep it up to date. also how is this tested?

I just align with the settings coming from the other components
who are coming from field best practice . compared with other k8s distro

[thunderboltsid]

/retest