-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 81
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Attempt @ 93% for a nixOs FlakeUtils #18
Conversation
code is now in master.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not much, but structure and very few features ...
Can you add a usage example? If the goal is to find the right direction then the best is to test it out in some semi-realistic scenario. |
I'll see if I can rebase nixflk off this PR as a usage example. But it'll be a few days before I have the time. |
Thanks, truely! It will bring in your most vetted perspective. |
I advanced a little and added an example stub. I think this is slowly getting into the right direction... |
b997844
to
435894c
Compare
@nrdxp In the last two commits, I added a relatively decent way to build sd, iso & netboot derivations for any host. |
outdated
@nrdxp First, I thought it would be only fair not only to spill around nice ideas all over the place, but to actually attempt to implement some of it. Then I got stuck with how to model a sensible way of how
nrdxp/nixflk
imports./hosts
. Then I realized, this is another fixing-things spree of mine lacking of the corresponding underlaying abilities. Then I got frustrated. Now I just want to share how far I got in case it might be useful or a source of inspiration. I still think relying on a higher level abstraction for nixos flakes by sponsorship of thisnumtide/flalke-utils
repo is a future state worth an attempt.