Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Changes to gwem_resampling_utils #212

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 31, 2023

Conversation

haukekoehn
Copy link
Contributor

Because the luminosity_distance_to_redshift function of bilby doesn't scale well, a custom version of that function is added that is faster. Overall, the timesave is small, but until the luminosity_distance_to_redshift functionin bilby is not improved, we should refrain from using it.

Because the luminosity_to_redshift function of bilby doesn't scale well,
a custom version of that function is added that is faster. Overall, the
timesave is small, but until the luminosity_distance_to_redshift
functionin bilby is not improved, we should refrain from using it.
@mcoughlin mcoughlin requested a review from tsunhopang August 28, 2023 13:47
@mcoughlin
Copy link
Member

@tsunhopang Will you have time to review this?

@tsunhopang
Copy link
Collaborator

LGTM, waiting for the checking results

When resampling, the EM posterior now can also only contain the total ejecta mass, instead of having the seperate wind and dynamical mass. This is required, because in some GRB models only the total mass is given.
@haukekoehn haukekoehn changed the title Changing redshift function Changes to gwem_resampling_utils Aug 31, 2023
@tsunhopang tsunhopang merged commit 5e17a5c into nuclear-multimessenger-astronomy:main Aug 31, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants