let constraint = TypeConstraint<Account, Account.Error> {
KeyPathConstraint(\.username) {
BlockConstraint {
$0.count >= 5
} errorBuilder: {
.username
}
}
KeyPathConstraint(\.password) {
GroupConstraint(.all) {
PredicateConstraint {
.characterSet(.lowercaseLetters, mode: .inclusive)
} errorBuilder: {
.password(.missingLowercase)
}
PredicateConstraint{
.characterSet(.uppercaseLetters, mode: .inclusive)
} errorBuilder: {
.password(.missingUppercase)
}
PredicateConstraint {
.characterSet(.decimalDigits, mode: .inclusive)
} errorBuilder: {
.password(.missingDigits)
}
PredicateConstraint {
.characterSet(CharacterSet(charactersIn: "!?@#$%^&*()|\\/<>,.~`_+-="), mode: .inclusive)
} errorBuilder: {
.password(.missingSpecialChars)
}
PredicateConstraint {
.length(min: 8)
} errorBuilder: {
.password(.tooShort)
}
}
}
BlockConstraint {
$0.password == $0.passwordConfirmation
} errorBuilder: {
.password(.confirmationMismatch)
}
KeyPathConstraint(\.email) {
PredicateConstraint(.email, error: .email)
}
KeyPathConstraint(\.age) {
PredicateConstraint(.range(min: 14), error: .underAge)
}
KeyPathConstraint(\.website) {
PredicateConstraint(.url, error: .website)
.optional()
}
}
let result = constraint.evaluate(with: account)
switch result {
case .success:
handleSuccess()
case .failure(let summary):
handleErrors(summary.errors)
}
Peppermint
is a declarative and lightweight data validation framework.
At the core of it, there are 2 principles:
- Empower composition.
- Embrace standard library.
Every project is unique in it's own challenges and it's great when we can focus on solving them instead of spending our time on boilerplate tasks.
With this idea in mind, the framework follows the Protocol Oriented Programming paradigm and was designed from a small set of protocols and structures that can easily be composed to fit your project needs. Thus, you can think of Peppermint
as an adjustable wrench more than a Swiss knife.
Since validation can take place at many levels, Peppermint
is available on iOS, macOS, tvOS, watchOS and native Swift projects, such as server-side apps.
- Swift 4.2+
- iOS 8.0+ / macOS 10.10+ / tvOS 9.0+ / watchOS 2.0+
- Xcode 8.1+
Peppermint
is available only through Swift Package Manager.
You can add Peppermint
to your project in Xcode by going to File > Swift Packages > Add Package Dependency
.
Or, if you want to use it as a dependency to your own package, you can add it to your Package.swift
file:
import PackageDescription
let package = Package(
name: "YOUR_PROJECT_NAME",
targets: [],
dependencies: [
.Package(url: "https://github.com/nsagora/peppermint", majorVersion: 1),
]
)
For a comprehensive list of examples try out the Examples.playground
:
- Download the repository locally on your machine
- Open the project in Xcode
- Select the
Examples
playground from the Project navigator
The Peppermint
framework is compact and offers you the foundation you need to build data validation around your project needs. In addition, it includes a set of common validation predicates and constraints that most projects can benefit off.
The Predicate
represents the core protocol
and has the role to evaluate
if an input matches on a given validation condition.
At the core of Peppermint
there are the following two predicates, which allows you to compose predicates specific to the project needs:
BlockPredicate
let predicate = BlockPredicate<String> { $0.characters.count > 2 }
predicate.evaluate(with: "a") // returns false
predicate.evaluate(with: "abc") // returns true
RegexPredicate
let predicate = RegexPredicate(expression: "^[a-z]$")
predicate.evaluate(with: "a") // returns true
predicate.evaluate(with: "5") // returns false
predicate.evaluate(with: "ab") // returns false
In addition, the framework offers a set of common validation predicates that your project can benefit of:
EmailPredicate
let predicate = EmailPredicate()
predicate.evaluate(with: "hello@") // returns false
predicate.evaluate(with: "hello@nsagora.com") // returns true
predicate.evaluate(with: "héllo@nsagora.com") // returns true
URLPredicate
let predicate = URLPredicate()
predicate.evaluate(with: "http://www.url.com") // returns true
predicate.evaluate(with: "http:\\www.url.com") // returns false
RangePredicate
let predicate = let range = RangePredicate(10...20)
predicate.evaluate(with: 15) // returns true
predicate.evaluate(with: 21) // returns false
LengthPredicate
let predicate = LengthPredicate<String>(min: 5)
predicate.evaluate(with: "abcde") // returns true
predicate.evaluate(with: "abcd") // returns false
On top of that, developers can build more advanced or complex predicates by extending the Predicate
protocol, and/ or by composing or decorating the existing predicates:
Custom Predicate
public struct CustomPredicate: Predicate {
public typealias InputType = String
private let custom: String
public init(custom: String) {
self.custom = custom
}
public func evaluate(with input: String) -> Bool {
return input == custom
}
}
let predicate = CustomPredicate(custom: "alphabet")
predicate.evaluate(with: "alp") // returns false
predicate.evaluate(with: "alpha") // returns false
predicate.evaluate(with: "alphabet") // returns true
A PredicateConstraint
represents a data type that links a Predicate
to an Error
, in order to provide useful feedback for the end users.
PredicateConstraint
let constraint = PredicateConstraint<String, MyError>(.email, error: .invalid)
let result = constraint.evaluate(with: "hello@nsagora.com")
switch result {
case .valid:
print("Hi there 👋!")
case .invalid(let summary):
print("Oh, I was expecting a valid email address!")
} // prints "Hi there 👋!"
enum MyError: Error {
case invalid
}
A BlockConstraint
represents a data type that links a custom validation closure to an Error
that describes why the evaluation has failed. It's a shortcut of a PredicateConstraint
that is initialised with a BlockPredicate
.
BlockConstraint
let constraint = BlockConstraint<Int, MyError> {
$0 % 2 == 0
} errorBuilder: {
.magicNumber
}
constraint.evaluate(with: 3)
enum Failure: MyError {
case magicNumber
}
A GroupConstraint
represents a composition of constraints that allows the evaluation to be made on:
- all constraints
- or any of the constraints
To provide context, a GroupConstraint
allows us to constraint a piece of data as being required and also as being a valid email.
GroupConstraint
An example of a registration form, whereby users are prompted to enter a strong password. This process typically entails some form of validation, but the logic itself is often unstructured and spread out through a view controller.Peppermint
seeks instead to consolidate, standardise, and make explicit the logic that is being used to validate user input. To this end, the below example demonstrates construction of a full GroupConstraint
object that can be used to enforce requirements on the user's password data:
var passwordConstraint = GroupConstraint<String, Form.Password>(.all) {
PredicateConstraint {
.characterSet(.lowercaseLetters, mode: .loose)
} errorBuilder: {
.missingLowercase
}
PredicateConstraint{
.characterSet(.uppercaseLetters, mode: .loose)
} errorBuilder: {
.missingUppercase
}
PredicateConstraint {
.characterSet(.decimalDigits, mode: .loose)
} errorBuilder: {
.missingDigits
}
PredicateConstraint {
.characterSet(CharacterSet(charactersIn: "!?@#$%^&*()|\\/<>,.~`_+-="), mode: .loose)
} errorBuilder: {
.missingSpecialChars
}
PredicateConstraint {
.length(min: 8)
} errorBuilder: {
.minLength(8)
}
}
let password = "3nGuard!"
let result = passwordConstraint.evaluate(with: password)
switch result {
case .success:
print("Wow, that's a 💪 password!")
case .failure(let summary):
print(summary.errors.map({$0.localizedDescription}))
} // prints "Wow, that's a 💪 password!"
From above, we see that once we've constructed the passwordConstraint
, we're simply calling evaluate(with:)
to get our evaluation Result
. This contains a Summary
that can be handled as we please.
We would love you for the contribution to Peppermint, check the LICENSE
file for more info.
This project is developed and maintained by the members of iOS NSAgora, the community of iOS Developers of Iași, Romania.
Distributed under the MIT license. See LICENSE
for more information.