feat(testing): use new test environment function from jest-preset-angular

[chabb]

jest-preset-angular is now using setupZoneTestEnv

Current Behavior

jest-preset-angular issues a deprecation warning

Expected Behavior

this MR removes this warning

Related Issue(s)

Fixes #29165

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

1 Skipped Deployment

Name	Status	Preview	Updated (UTC)
nx-dev	⬜️ Ignored (Inspect)	Visit Preview	Dec 3, 2024 4:33pm

[nx-cloud]

☁️ Nx Cloud Report

CI is running/has finished running commands for commit 8c062fe. As they complete they will appear below. Click to see the status, the terminal output, and the build insights.

📂 See all runs for this CI Pipeline Execution

---

✅ Successfully ran 6 targets

• nx affected --targets=lint,test,build,e2e,e2e-ci --base=9ad6b8c208b0930b571ed644659097ea68b0850d --head=8c062fea31040cb2c618702a6809ba2fb74dc36a --parallel=3
• nx run-many -t check-imports check-commit check-lock-files check-codeowners documentation --parallel=1 --no-dte
• nx-cloud record -- nx-cloud conformance:check
• nx-cloud record -- nx format:check --base=9ad6b8c208b0930b571ed644659097ea68b0850d --head=8c062fea31040cb2c618702a6809ba2fb74dc36a
• nx-cloud record -- nx sync:check
• nx documentation --no-dte

---

Sent with 💌 from NxCloud.

[leosvelperez]

Thanks for the contribution!

The change looks good overall, but we need to support older versions of jest-preset-angular where this new setup function doesn't exist.

Can you update the PR to conditionally generate the new or old setup depending on the installed version of the jest-preset-angular package? The new setup was made available in version 14.3.0. Let me know if you need help with it.

I rebased the PR, moved the setupZoneTestEnv call to the template file in the @nx/jest package where we generate the import, and added some extra test coverage.

[leosvelperez]

Something is messed up with this PR in CI at the moment and no tasks are run. To unblock it I re-created it at #29169, and I'll close this one.

Thanks a lot for the contribution!

[chabb]

@leosvelperez Thanks for taking care of the MR, I unfortunately had no time to get back at it this week

[github-actions]

This pull request has already been merged/closed. If you experience issues related to these changes, please open a new issue referencing this pull request.