Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

WIP: Batch vs single #150

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Aug 30, 2023
Merged

WIP: Batch vs single #150

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 7 commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
05d65e0
doc: Example of batch vs. single experiment
SRFU-NN Mar 17, 2023
24ce31d
doc: Only one starting trip in batch_vs_single
SRFU-NN Mar 17, 2023
fea0352
doc: Other strategies for batch opt.ask()
SRFU-NN Mar 17, 2023
5cf57ac
Merge branch 'new_examples' into batch_vs_single
SRFU-NN Mar 22, 2023
964008d
doc: Updated batch_vs_single.ipynb
SRFU-NN Mar 22, 2023
6cef690
fix: Finished the change of how to initialise PO
SRFU-NN Mar 22, 2023
1d9c8c1
doc: Finished first draft of batch_vs_single
SRFU-NN Mar 23, 2023
b58cc30
doc: Minor changes in batch_vs_single.ipynb
SRFU-NN Mar 29, 2023
b627001
Merge branch 'new_examples' into batch_vs_single
SRFU-NN Aug 30, 2023
52f28d1
doc: batch_vs_single.ipynb uses ModelSystem
SRFU-NN Aug 30, 2023
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
360 changes: 360 additions & 0 deletions examples/new_examples/batch_vs_single.ipynb
View file
Open in desktop

Large diffs are not rendered by default.

4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions examples/new_examples/new_examples.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -17,8 +17,8 @@ Can GitHub Actions run the notebooks and check for errors? (Treebeard?)
3. "Good enough" found during initialisation
4. batch vs. single opt.ask()
5. Noise
6. Narrow wells
7. Explore vs. exploit (Gold Diggerson vs. Map Drawson)
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think explore vs. exploit is the natural next place to go, since we have just talked about strategies.

6. Explore vs. exploit (Gold Diggerson vs. Map Drawson)
7. Narrow wells
8. Plots (more about ALL of the plots)
9. Uncertainty
10. When to stop?
Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion examples/new_examples/start_here.ipynb
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@
],
"source": [
"def score(coordinates, verbose = True):\n",
" \"\"\" Modified Branin-Hoo function. It has three minima with f(x*) = 0.397887 \n",
" \"\"\" Modified Branin-Hoo function. It has three local minima.\n",
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have simplified the score function from the standard Branin-Hoo, so it doesn't have as nice analytical properties anymore. We don't need the optima to have exactly identical scores, so I value the simplicity of the function higher.

" More details: <http://www.sfu.ca/~ssurjano/branin.html>\n",
" \"\"\"\n",
" x = 10-coordinates[0]\n",
Expand Down