Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: update incorrect code comments regarding dynamicParams #6473

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 13, 2024

Conversation

dario-piotrowicz
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Very minor, this PR is simply updating a couple of code comments around dynamicParams which I am pretty sure are wrong and just copy-pastas (and indeed they confused me at first)

Check List

  • I have read the Contributing Guidelines and made commit messages that follow the guideline.
  • I have run npx turbo format to ensure the code follows the style guide.

@dario-piotrowicz dario-piotrowicz requested a review from a team as a code owner March 12, 2024 21:50
Copy link

vercel bot commented Mar 12, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Updated (UTC)
nodejs-org ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview Mar 12, 2024 9:52pm

Copy link
Member

@ovflowd ovflowd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh yes, these are definitely wrong. With dynamicParams = true the behaviour is definitely not the one commented there.

Nice catch!

@ovflowd ovflowd added the github_actions:pull-request Trigger Pull Request Checks label Mar 12, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the github_actions:pull-request Trigger Pull Request Checks label Mar 12, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 12, 2024

Lighthouse Results

URL Performance Accessibility Best Practices SEO Report
/en 🟢 99 🟢 90 🟢 96 🟢 91 🔗
/en/about 🟢 100 🟢 91 🟢 100 🟢 91 🔗
/en/about/previous-releases 🟢 100 🟢 90 🟢 100 🟢 92 🔗
/en/download 🟢 100 🟠 89 🟢 100 🟢 91 🔗
/en/blog 🟢 100 🟢 90 🟢 96 🟢 92 🔗

Copy link
Contributor

Unit Test Coverage Report

Lines Statements Branches Functions
Coverage: 84%
80.07% (450/562) 79.55% (144/181) 71.17% (79/111)

Unit Test Report

Tests Skipped Failures Errors Time
90 0 💤 0 ❌ 0 🔥 4.634s ⏱️

Copy link
Member

@AugustinMauroy AugustinMauroy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM ! Thanks for you first contribution 🎉

@bmuenzenmeyer bmuenzenmeyer added the fast-track Fast Tracking PRs label Mar 13, 2024
@bmuenzenmeyer
Copy link
Collaborator

fast tracking - simple (but important!) change

@bmuenzenmeyer bmuenzenmeyer merged commit 5e6a6e2 into nodejs:main Mar 13, 2024
19 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
fast-track Fast Tracking PRs
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants