Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: move test-fs-utimes to sequential #54844

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

jasnell
Copy link
Member

@jasnell jasnell commented Sep 8, 2024

Attempt to deal with flaky failures in CI by moving this to the sequential suite rather than the parallel suite

@jasnell jasnell requested a review from anonrig September 8, 2024 00:31
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. test Issues and PRs related to the tests. labels Sep 8, 2024
@jasnell

This comment was marked as outdated.

@avivkeller avivkeller added the fs Issues and PRs related to the fs subsystem / file system. label Sep 8, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 8, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.07%. Comparing base (123bb4c) to head (dc88b56).
Report is 212 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #54844   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   88.07%   88.07%           
=======================================
  Files         651      651           
  Lines      183396   183375   -21     
  Branches    35795    35802    +7     
=======================================
- Hits       161523   161507   -16     
+ Misses      15161    15150   -11     
- Partials     6712     6718    +6     

see 45 files with indirect coverage changes

@jasnell jasnell added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Sep 8, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Sep 8, 2024
@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@lpinca
Copy link
Member

lpinca commented Sep 8, 2024

Did you get a timeout in #37692 (comment)? Because that is what was happening in our CI and only on ppc64le.

@jasnell
Copy link
Member Author

jasnell commented Sep 8, 2024

Did you get a timeout ...

Yes. When I ran enough concurrently load the test timed out locally. It wasn't easy but I was able to reproduce.

@jasnell jasnell added the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Sep 8, 2024
Attempt to deal with flaky failures in CI by moving this
to the sequential suite rather than the parallel suite
@jasnell jasnell force-pushed the move-test-fs-utimes-sequential branch from 21957c4 to dc88b56 Compare September 11, 2024 14:44
@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@lpinca
Copy link
Member

lpinca commented Sep 12, 2024

Some tests time out due to a deadlock during process shutdown, see #52550 (comment). I think that the underlying issue is the same here. We could revert this when a fix lands.

@jasnell jasnell closed this Sep 26, 2024
@jasnell
Copy link
Member Author

jasnell commented Sep 26, 2024

Closing this while we see if fixes to the deadlock resolve the issue

lpinca added a commit to lpinca/node that referenced this pull request Nov 28, 2024
The issue is likely the same as other tests that time out.

Refs: nodejs#54918
Refs: nodejs#54844
lpinca added a commit to lpinca/node that referenced this pull request Nov 28, 2024
The issue is likely the same as other tests that time out.

Refs: nodejs#54918
Refs: nodejs#54844
Refs: nodejs#54802
lpinca added a commit to lpinca/node that referenced this pull request Dec 1, 2024
The issue is likely the same as other tests that time out.

Refs: nodejs#54918
Refs: nodejs#54844
Refs: nodejs#54802
nodejs-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 6, 2024
The issue is likely the same as other tests that time out.

Refs: #54918
Refs: #54844
Refs: #54802
PR-URL: #56052
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 6, 2024
The issue is likely the same as other tests that time out.

Refs: #54918
Refs: #54844
Refs: #54802
PR-URL: #56052
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 13, 2024
The issue is likely the same as other tests that time out.

Refs: #54918
Refs: #54844
Refs: #54802
PR-URL: #56052
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 13, 2024
The issue is likely the same as other tests that time out.

Refs: #54918
Refs: #54844
Refs: #54802
PR-URL: #56052
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 13, 2024
The issue is likely the same as other tests that time out.

Refs: #54918
Refs: #54844
Refs: #54802
PR-URL: #56052
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 18, 2024
The issue is likely the same as other tests that time out.

Refs: #54918
Refs: #54844
Refs: #54802
PR-URL: #56052
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. fs Issues and PRs related to the fs subsystem / file system. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. test Issues and PRs related to the tests.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants