-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
tls: check result of SSL_CTX_set_*_proto_version #53459
Merged
nodejs-github-bot
merged 1 commit into
nodejs:main
from
tniessen:tls-dont-ignore-version-setter-ret
Jun 16, 2024
Merged
tls: check result of SSL_CTX_set_*_proto_version #53459
nodejs-github-bot
merged 1 commit into
nodejs:main
from
tniessen:tls-dont-ignore-version-setter-ret
Jun 16, 2024
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
These functions generally should not fail, but we also shouldn't ignore potential failures entirely since security properties of the application might depend on successful configuration. This also is consistent with the existing CHECKs in SetMinProto() and SetMaxProto().
tniessen
added
tls
Issues and PRs related to the tls subsystem.
openssl
Issues and PRs related to the OpenSSL dependency.
labels
Jun 14, 2024
Review requested:
|
nodejs-github-bot
added
c++
Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++.
crypto
Issues and PRs related to the crypto subsystem.
needs-ci
PRs that need a full CI run.
labels
Jun 14, 2024
github-actions
bot
removed
the
request-ci
Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR.
label
Jun 15, 2024
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
lpinca
approved these changes
Jun 15, 2024
tniessen
added
the
author ready
PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started.
label
Jun 15, 2024
richardlau
approved these changes
Jun 15, 2024
tniessen
added
the
commit-queue
Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions.
label
Jun 15, 2024
nodejs-github-bot
removed
the
commit-queue
Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions.
label
Jun 16, 2024
Landed in 474d2f4 |
targos
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 20, 2024
These functions generally should not fail, but we also shouldn't ignore potential failures entirely since security properties of the application might depend on successful configuration. This also is consistent with the existing CHECKs in SetMinProto() and SetMaxProto(). PR-URL: #53459 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com>
sophoniie
pushed a commit
to sophoniie/node
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 20, 2024
These functions generally should not fail, but we also shouldn't ignore potential failures entirely since security properties of the application might depend on successful configuration. This also is consistent with the existing CHECKs in SetMinProto() and SetMaxProto(). PR-URL: nodejs#53459 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com>
bmeck
pushed a commit
to bmeck/node
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 22, 2024
These functions generally should not fail, but we also shouldn't ignore potential failures entirely since security properties of the application might depend on successful configuration. This also is consistent with the existing CHECKs in SetMinProto() and SetMaxProto(). PR-URL: nodejs#53459 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com>
marco-ippolito
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 19, 2024
These functions generally should not fail, but we also shouldn't ignore potential failures entirely since security properties of the application might depend on successful configuration. This also is consistent with the existing CHECKs in SetMinProto() and SetMaxProto(). PR-URL: #53459 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com>
marco-ippolito
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 19, 2024
These functions generally should not fail, but we also shouldn't ignore potential failures entirely since security properties of the application might depend on successful configuration. This also is consistent with the existing CHECKs in SetMinProto() and SetMaxProto(). PR-URL: #53459 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com>
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
author ready
PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started.
c++
Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++.
crypto
Issues and PRs related to the crypto subsystem.
needs-ci
PRs that need a full CI run.
openssl
Issues and PRs related to the OpenSSL dependency.
tls
Issues and PRs related to the tls subsystem.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
These functions generally should not fail, but we also shouldn't ignore potential failures entirely since security properties of the application might depend on successful configuration.
This also is consistent with the existing
CHECK
s inSetMinProto()
andSetMaxProto()
.