-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
stream: pre-allocate _events #50428
stream: pre-allocate _events #50428
Conversation
ronag
commented
Oct 27, 2023
•
edited
Loading
edited
Review requested:
|
Will continue the review tomorrow night, but one general note, I think you should avoid deleting those events when removing listener, and IIRC I think we use the number of keys exists in order to see how many events we listen to |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
54755f2
to
4e46fdf
Compare
cc6dfe0
to
89ad099
Compare
673f925
to
507478e
Compare
@@ -750,6 +758,7 @@ EventEmitter.prototype.removeAllListeners = | |||
else | |||
delete events[type]; | |||
} | |||
this[kShapeMode] = false; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why? What if we just have an object template (template in the abstract way not v8 one) and use that when resetting? (Same for the one below)
(This is not really important comment as it's not happening on a regular basis)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't understand
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe reset _events
to the template you provided (e.g. with data event key) instead to the default one (i.e. empty with proto null)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That would require us to keep the template in memory and then create copies. Maybe having some kind of reset/initEvents
override is better but starts to make things complciated.
@@ -63,6 +63,24 @@ function Duplex(options) { | |||
if (!(this instanceof Duplex)) | |||
return new Duplex(options); | |||
|
|||
this._events ??= { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't really think we should modify the private property _events
like that, maybe have an option or an api for setting events template in the EventEmitter class?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Follow up PR welcome?
Landed in 2aaa21f |
No longer necessary given recent stream and event optimziations. Refs: nodejs#50428 Refs: nodejs#50439 PR-URL: nodejs#50440
No longer necessary given recent stream and event optimziations. Refs: nodejs#50428 Refs: nodejs#50439 PR-URL: nodejs#50440
No longer necessary given recent stream and event optimziations. Refs: nodejs#50428 Refs: nodejs#50439 PR-URL: nodejs#50440
No longer necessary given recent stream and event optimziations. Refs: nodejs#50428 Refs: nodejs#50439 PR-URL: nodejs#50440
PR-URL: nodejs#50428 Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com> Reviewed-By: Vinícius Lourenço Claro Cardoso <contact@viniciusl.com.br> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #50428 Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com> Reviewed-By: Vinícius Lourenço Claro Cardoso <contact@viniciusl.com.br> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #50428 Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com> Reviewed-By: Vinícius Lourenço Claro Cardoso <contact@viniciusl.com.br> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #50428 Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com> Reviewed-By: Vinícius Lourenço Claro Cardoso <contact@viniciusl.com.br> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
This seems to have broken the |
Refs: nodejs#50428 PR-URL: nodejs#51925 Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Vinícius Lourenço Claro Cardoso <contact@viniciusl.com.br>