Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: ignore helper files in WPTs #48079

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 21, 2023

Conversation

panva
Copy link
Member

@panva panva commented May 19, 2023

Because daily WPT report started timing out on these helper files. These are not test entrypoints so we're not losing any coverage.

@panva panva added test Issues and PRs related to the tests. fast-track PRs that do not need to wait for 48 hours to land. request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. labels May 19, 2023
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. label May 19, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label May 19, 2023
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@panva panva removed the fast-track PRs that do not need to wait for 48 hours to land. label May 19, 2023
@nodejs nodejs deleted a comment from github-actions bot May 19, 2023
@panva
Copy link
Member Author

panva commented May 20, 2023

I'm hoping to just rename the one offending file that doesn't follow the, I assume unwritten, convention.

Copy link
Member

@KhafraDev KhafraDev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Although there's no harm in skipping these files, I don't understand why they would time out. Is it a deeper problem with the WPT runner?

@panva
Copy link
Member Author

panva commented May 20, 2023

Is it a deeper problem with the WPT runner?

The way it selects files that contain tests is definitely one. Combined with the recent change to register a timeout to keep the event loop spinning being another, I wanted to avoid that but the wpt maintainers weren't keen to acknowledging our event loop and called my patch to a particular test a bug hiding solution instead.

We can go with this workaround for now until I get the time to pull in the native WPT python tool scripts that build the manifest of files to run. That should avoid any future test file selection problems.

@panva panva added the commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. label May 21, 2023
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot removed the commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. label May 21, 2023
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot merged commit 6439f68 into nodejs:main May 21, 2023
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Landed in 6439f68

@panva panva deleted the wpt-ignore-helpers branch May 21, 2023 13:58
fasenderos pushed a commit to fasenderos/node that referenced this pull request May 22, 2023
PR-URL: nodejs#48079
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: Matthew Aitken <maitken033380023@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
fasenderos pushed a commit to fasenderos/node that referenced this pull request May 22, 2023
PR-URL: nodejs#48079
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: Matthew Aitken <maitken033380023@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 30, 2023
PR-URL: #48079
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: Matthew Aitken <maitken033380023@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
@targos targos mentioned this pull request Jun 4, 2023
danielleadams pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 6, 2023
PR-URL: #48079
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: Matthew Aitken <maitken033380023@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
MoLow pushed a commit to MoLow/node that referenced this pull request Jul 6, 2023
PR-URL: nodejs#48079
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: Matthew Aitken <maitken033380023@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Ceres6 pushed a commit to Ceres6/node that referenced this pull request Aug 14, 2023
PR-URL: nodejs#48079
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: Matthew Aitken <maitken033380023@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Ceres6 pushed a commit to Ceres6/node that referenced this pull request Aug 14, 2023
PR-URL: nodejs#48079
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: Matthew Aitken <maitken033380023@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. test Issues and PRs related to the tests.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants