-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
doc: update process.release #35167
doc: update process.release #35167
Conversation
doc/api/process.md
Outdated
@@ -1773,18 +1773,17 @@ tarball. | |||
* `lts` {string} a string label identifying the [LTS][] label for this release. | |||
This property only exists for LTS releases and is `undefined` for all other | |||
release types, including _Current_ releases. Currently the valid values are: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If we're not going to maintain a list of all possible values, then I think we should change the preceding wording here from "Currently the valid values are:" to something like "Valid values may include:" to indicate that the following list is a subset. While "Argon" and others may no longer be supported they are still technically LTS release lines that someone could encounter.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How about "Valid values include the LTS Release Codenames (including those that are no longer supported). A non-exhaustive example of these codenames includes:" ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Perhaps the links to Release schedule and Changelogs on Github should also be included?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@schamberg97 That sounds good, feel free to add those 🙂
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'll do it, but I am away from computer until midgnight
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We currently have a waiting period of 48 hours before we merge any non-trivial PR anyway, so take your time :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry for the delay, had problems with my personal OSS project that was a bigger priority for me. This should probably be reviewed again, just in case
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me, with or without the one suggestion I made.
Landed in 571dff8 |
Thanks for the contribution! 🎉 |
`process.release` documentation is out of date. This commit makes it up to date. PR-URL: #35167 Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
`process.release` documentation is out of date. This commit makes it up to date. PR-URL: #35167 Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
`process.release` documentation is out of date. This commit makes it up to date. PR-URL: #35167 Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
`process.release` documentation is out of date. This commit makes it up to date. PR-URL: nodejs#35167 Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Process.release doc is severely outdated. This PR includes info about LTS releases 10 and 12.
Checklist