Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

deps: V8: cherry-pick deac757 #29626

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

deps: V8: cherry-pick deac757 #29626

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

bcoe
Copy link
Contributor

@bcoe bcoe commented Sep 20, 2019 •
edited
Loading

Original commit message:

[debugger] Fix code coverage for break/return inside switch-case

Case statements have a list of statements associated with them, but are
not blocks, and were hence not fixed-up correctly for code coverage.
This CL also applies the fix-up to the "body" of case statements,
in this way removing ranges reported as uncovered between the final
break/return in a case and the next case (or end of function).

Drive-by: Add optional pretty printing to code coverage test results.

Change-Id: I5f4002d4e17b7253ed516d99f7c389ab2264be10
Bug: v8:9705
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1798426
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Sigurd Schneider <sigurds@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63719}

Refs: v8/v8@deac757

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • tests and/or benchmarks are included
  • documentation is changed or added
  • commit message follows commit guidelines

@bcoe
deps: V8: cherry-pick deac757
b2e7100 
Original commit message:

    [debugger] Fix code coverage for break/return inside switch-case

    Case statements have a list of statements associated with them, but are
    not blocks, and were hence not fixed-up correctly for code coverage.
    This CL also applies the fix-up to the "body" of case statements,
    in this way removing ranges reported as uncovered between the final
    break/return in a case and the next case (or end of function).

    Drive-by: Add optional pretty printing to code coverage test results.

    Change-Id: I5f4002d4e17b7253ed516d99f7c389ab2264be10
    Bug: v8:9705
    Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1798426
    Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
    Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
    Commit-Queue: Sigurd Schneider <sigurds@chromium.org>
    Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63719}

Refs: v8/v8@deac757
@bcoe bcoe added fast-track PRs that do not need to wait for 48 hours to land. backport-blocked-v12.x labels Sep 20, 2019
@bcoe bcoe requested a review from Trott September 20, 2019 02:59
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added build Issues and PRs related to build files or the CI. v8 engine Issues and PRs related to the V8 dependency. labels Sep 20, 2019
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

nodejs-github-bot commented Sep 20, 2019 •
edited by bcoe
Loading

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/25591/
V8-CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-commit-v8-linux/2510/

@bcoe
Copy link
Contributor Author

bcoe commented Sep 20, 2019

@nodejs/backporters

@bcoe
Copy link
Contributor Author

bcoe commented Sep 20, 2019

I would like to fast track this PR; it's fairly low touch, and corrects our nightly coverage CC: @Trott.

@targos
Copy link
Member

targos commented Sep 20, 2019

Why backport-blocked?

@bcoe
Copy link
Contributor Author

bcoe commented Sep 20, 2019

@targos whoops, meant to put "backport requested" 😂

@targos
Copy link
Member

targos commented Sep 20, 2019

Okay, but does it actually need a backport? We have the same version of V8 in master and v12.x-staging

@bcoe
Copy link
Contributor Author

bcoe commented Sep 20, 2019

@targos just wanted to make sure it lands in v12.x-staging 👌 sounds like the label is redundant.

I don't think we need to backport to older nodes.

@addaleax addaleax added the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Sep 21, 2019
@addaleax
Copy link
Member

CI is green, so if somebody wants to approve fast-tracking by upvoting #29626 (comment) you can also feel free to land this :)

bcoe added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 21, 2019
@bcoe
deps: V8: cherry-pick deac757
f634f37 
Original commit message:

    [debugger] Fix code coverage for break/return inside switch-case

    Case statements have a list of statements associated with them, but are
    not blocks, and were hence not fixed-up correctly for code coverage.
    This CL also applies the fix-up to the "body" of case statements,
    in this way removing ranges reported as uncovered between the final
    break/return in a case and the next case (or end of function).

    Drive-by: Add optional pretty printing to code coverage test results.

    Change-Id: I5f4002d4e17b7253ed516d99f7c389ab2264be10
    Bug: v8:9705
    Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1798426
    Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
    Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
    Commit-Queue: Sigurd Schneider <sigurds@chromium.org>
    Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63719}

Refs: v8/v8@deac757

PR-URL: #29626
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Shelley Vohr <codebytere@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
@bcoe
Copy link
Contributor Author

bcoe commented Sep 21, 2019

Landed in f634f37

@bcoe bcoe closed this Sep 21, 2019
@bcoe bcoe deleted the v8-coverage-fix branch September 21, 2019 18:00
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 23, 2019
@bcoe @targos
deps: V8: cherry-pick deac757
a969537 
Original commit message:

    [debugger] Fix code coverage for break/return inside switch-case

    Case statements have a list of statements associated with them, but are
    not blocks, and were hence not fixed-up correctly for code coverage.
    This CL also applies the fix-up to the "body" of case statements,
    in this way removing ranges reported as uncovered between the final
    break/return in a case and the next case (or end of function).

    Drive-by: Add optional pretty printing to code coverage test results.

    Change-Id: I5f4002d4e17b7253ed516d99f7c389ab2264be10
    Bug: v8:9705
    Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1798426
    Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
    Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
    Commit-Queue: Sigurd Schneider <sigurds@chromium.org>
    Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63719}

Refs: v8/v8@deac757

PR-URL: #29626
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Shelley Vohr <codebytere@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
@BridgeAR BridgeAR mentioned this pull request Sep 24, 2019
Merged
BridgeAR pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 25, 2019
@bcoe @BridgeAR
deps: V8: cherry-pick deac757
c718c60 
Original commit message:

    [debugger] Fix code coverage for break/return inside switch-case

    Case statements have a list of statements associated with them, but are
    not blocks, and were hence not fixed-up correctly for code coverage.
    This CL also applies the fix-up to the "body" of case statements,
    in this way removing ranges reported as uncovered between the final
    break/return in a case and the next case (or end of function).

    Drive-by: Add optional pretty printing to code coverage test results.

    Change-Id: I5f4002d4e17b7253ed516d99f7c389ab2264be10
    Bug: v8:9705
    Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1798426
    Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
    Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
    Commit-Queue: Sigurd Schneider <sigurds@chromium.org>
    Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63719}

Refs: v8/v8@deac757

PR-URL: #29626
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Shelley Vohr <codebytere@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
This was referenced Sep 25, 2019
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
cjihrig pushed a commit to cjihrig/node that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2019
@bcoe @cjihrig
deps: V8: cherry-pick deac757
37fc308 
Original commit message:

    [debugger] Fix code coverage for break/return inside switch-case

    Case statements have a list of statements associated with them, but are
    not blocks, and were hence not fixed-up correctly for code coverage.
    This CL also applies the fix-up to the "body" of case statements,
    in this way removing ranges reported as uncovered between the final
    break/return in a case and the next case (or end of function).

    Drive-by: Add optional pretty printing to code coverage test results.

    Change-Id: I5f4002d4e17b7253ed516d99f7c389ab2264be10
    Bug: v8:9705
    Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1798426
    Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
    Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
    Commit-Queue: Sigurd Schneider <sigurds@chromium.org>
    Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63719}

Refs: v8/v8@deac757

PR-URL: nodejs#29626
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Shelley Vohr <codebytere@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
MylesBorins pushed a commit to MylesBorins/node that referenced this pull request Oct 7, 2019
@bcoe @MylesBorins
deps: V8: cherry-pick deac757
019b23b 
Original commit message:

    [debugger] Fix code coverage for break/return inside switch-case

    Case statements have a list of statements associated with them, but are
    not blocks, and were hence not fixed-up correctly for code coverage.
    This CL also applies the fix-up to the "body" of case statements,
    in this way removing ranges reported as uncovered between the final
    break/return in a case and the next case (or end of function).

    Drive-by: Add optional pretty printing to code coverage test results.

    Change-Id: I5f4002d4e17b7253ed516d99f7c389ab2264be10
    Bug: v8:9705
    Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1798426
    Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
    Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
    Commit-Queue: Sigurd Schneider <sigurds@chromium.org>
    Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63719}

Refs: v8/v8@deac757

PR-URL: nodejs#29626
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Shelley Vohr <codebytere@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2019
@bcoe @targos
deps: V8: cherry-pick deac757
00c3cd3 
Original commit message:

    [debugger] Fix code coverage for break/return inside switch-case

    Case statements have a list of statements associated with them, but are
    not blocks, and were hence not fixed-up correctly for code coverage.
    This CL also applies the fix-up to the "body" of case statements,
    in this way removing ranges reported as uncovered between the final
    break/return in a case and the next case (or end of function).

    Drive-by: Add optional pretty printing to code coverage test results.

    Change-Id: I5f4002d4e17b7253ed516d99f7c389ab2264be10
    Bug: v8:9705
    Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1798426
    Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
    Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
    Commit-Queue: Sigurd Schneider <sigurds@chromium.org>
    Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63719}

Refs: v8/v8@deac757

PR-URL: #29626
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Shelley Vohr <codebytere@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
targos pushed a commit to targos/node that referenced this pull request Oct 25, 2019
@bcoe @targos
deps: V8: cherry-pick deac757
e07885e 
Original commit message:

    [debugger] Fix code coverage for break/return inside switch-case

    Case statements have a list of statements associated with them, but are
    not blocks, and were hence not fixed-up correctly for code coverage.
    This CL also applies the fix-up to the "body" of case statements,
    in this way removing ranges reported as uncovered between the final
    break/return in a case and the next case (or end of function).

    Drive-by: Add optional pretty printing to code coverage test results.

    Change-Id: I5f4002d4e17b7253ed516d99f7c389ab2264be10
    Bug: v8:9705
    Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1798426
    Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
    Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
    Commit-Queue: Sigurd Schneider <sigurds@chromium.org>
    Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63719}

Refs: v8/v8@deac757

PR-URL: nodejs#29626
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Shelley Vohr <codebytere@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
targos pushed a commit to targos/node that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2019
@bcoe @targos
deps: V8: cherry-pick deac757
8f39f0a 
Original commit message:

    [debugger] Fix code coverage for break/return inside switch-case

    Case statements have a list of statements associated with them, but are
    not blocks, and were hence not fixed-up correctly for code coverage.
    This CL also applies the fix-up to the "body" of case statements,
    in this way removing ranges reported as uncovered between the final
    break/return in a case and the next case (or end of function).

    Drive-by: Add optional pretty printing to code coverage test results.

    Change-Id: I5f4002d4e17b7253ed516d99f7c389ab2264be10
    Bug: v8:9705
    Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1798426
    Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
    Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
    Commit-Queue: Sigurd Schneider <sigurds@chromium.org>
    Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63719}

Refs: v8/v8@deac757

PR-URL: nodejs#29626
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Shelley Vohr <codebytere@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
MylesBorins pushed a commit to targos/node that referenced this pull request Jan 7, 2020
@bcoe @MylesBorins
deps: V8: cherry-pick deac757
bc630ae 
Original commit message:

    [debugger] Fix code coverage for break/return inside switch-case

    Case statements have a list of statements associated with them, but are
    not blocks, and were hence not fixed-up correctly for code coverage.
    This CL also applies the fix-up to the "body" of case statements,
    in this way removing ranges reported as uncovered between the final
    break/return in a case and the next case (or end of function).

    Drive-by: Add optional pretty printing to code coverage test results.

    Change-Id: I5f4002d4e17b7253ed516d99f7c389ab2264be10
    Bug: v8:9705
    Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1798426
    Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
    Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
    Commit-Queue: Sigurd Schneider <sigurds@chromium.org>
    Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63719}

Refs: v8/v8@deac757

PR-URL: nodejs#29626
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Shelley Vohr <codebytere@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 8, 2020
@bcoe @MylesBorins
deps: V8: cherry-pick deac757
23271dd 
Original commit message:

    [debugger] Fix code coverage for break/return inside switch-case

    Case statements have a list of statements associated with them, but are
    not blocks, and were hence not fixed-up correctly for code coverage.
    This CL also applies the fix-up to the "body" of case statements,
    in this way removing ranges reported as uncovered between the final
    break/return in a case and the next case (or end of function).

    Drive-by: Add optional pretty printing to code coverage test results.

    Change-Id: I5f4002d4e17b7253ed516d99f7c389ab2264be10
    Bug: v8:9705
    Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1798426
    Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
    Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
    Commit-Queue: Sigurd Schneider <sigurds@chromium.org>
    Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63719}

Refs: v8/v8@deac757

Backport-PR-URL: #30109
PR-URL: #29626
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Shelley Vohr <codebytere@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
@targos targos mentioned this pull request Jan 15, 2020
Closed
BethGriggs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 6, 2020
@bcoe @BethGriggs
deps: V8: cherry-pick deac757
c43f5be 
Original commit message:

    [debugger] Fix code coverage for break/return inside switch-case

    Case statements have a list of statements associated with them, but are
    not blocks, and were hence not fixed-up correctly for code coverage.
    This CL also applies the fix-up to the "body" of case statements,
    in this way removing ranges reported as uncovered between the final
    break/return in a case and the next case (or end of function).

    Drive-by: Add optional pretty printing to code coverage test results.

    Change-Id: I5f4002d4e17b7253ed516d99f7c389ab2264be10
    Bug: v8:9705
    Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1798426
    Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
    Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
    Commit-Queue: Sigurd Schneider <sigurds@chromium.org>
    Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63719}

Refs: v8/v8@deac757

Backport-PR-URL: #30109
PR-URL: #29626
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Shelley Vohr <codebytere@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
@MylesBorins MylesBorins mentioned this pull request Feb 8, 2020
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@richardlau richardlau richardlau approved these changes

@codebytere codebytere codebytere approved these changes

@addaleax addaleax addaleax approved these changes

@Trott Trott Trott approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. build Issues and PRs related to build files or the CI. fast-track PRs that do not need to wait for 48 hours to land. v8 engine Issues and PRs related to the V8 dependency.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
7 participants
@bcoe @nodejs-github-bot @targos @addaleax @Trott @codebytere @richardlau