-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
doc,test: test documentation consistency for NODE_OPTIONS #28179
Conversation
This is a draft/wip because it currently (legitimately) fails: -bash-4.2$ ./node test/parallel/test-process-env-allowed-flags-are-documented.js
assert.js:89
throw new AssertionError(obj);
^
AssertionError [ERR_ASSERTION]: The following options are not documented as allowed in NODE_OPTIONS in /home/users/riclau/sandbox/github/nodejs/doc/api/cli.md: --tls-min-v1.2 --input-type --experimental-worker --tls-min-v1.3 --debug-arraybuffer-allocations --tls-max-v1.2 --experimental-policy --preserve-symlinks --http-parser --tls-min-v1.0 --es-module-specifier-resolution --preserve-symlinks-main --tls-max-v1.3 --tls-min-v1.1 --prof-process -r --debug-port
at Object.<anonymous> (/home/users/riclau/sandbox/github/nodejs/test/parallel/test-process-env-allowed-flags-are-documented.js:35:8)
at Module._compile (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:777:30)
at Object.Module._extensions..js (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:788:10)
at Module.load (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:640:32)
at Function.Module._load (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:555:12)
at Function.Module.runMain (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:840:10)
at internal/main/run_main_module.js:17:11 {
generatedMessage: false,
code: 'ERR_ASSERTION',
actual: 17,
expected: 0,
operator: 'strictEqual'
}
-bash-4.2$ #28146 will fix the missing tls options. I'll add the other missing entries to the docs. If anyone sees anything in this list that shouldn't be there please say so. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
e9202ca
to
5557153
Compare
const docsDir = path.resolve(__dirname, '..', '..', 'doc'); | ||
const cliMd = path.join(docsDir, 'api', 'cli.md'); | ||
const cliDocs = fs.readFileSync(cliMd, { encoding: 'utf8' }); | ||
const docRegExp = /^Node\.js options that are allowed are:$([^#]+)/m; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This seems brittle. A line-wrap change could break it. And I'll definitely break it when I inevitably decide to reduce passive voice from the doc. But I don't have a better idea, so...¯\(ツ)/¯ (FWIW, I'd prefer if the doc said something like "Valid options are:". But obviously that can and likely should be some other PR some time.)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
FWIW if we change the line in doc/api/cli.md
to Valid options are:
the test fails:
-bash-4.2$ ./node test/parallel/test-process-env-allowed-flags-are-documented.js
/home/users/riclau/sandbox/github/nodejs/test/parallel/test-process-env-allowed-flags-are-documented.js:17
const docOptions = cliDocs.match(docRegExp)[0];
^
TypeError: Cannot read property '0' of null
at Object.<anonymous> (/home/users/riclau/sandbox/github/nodejs/test/parallel/test-process-env-allowed-flags-are-documented.js:17:44)
at Module._compile (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:779:30)
at Object.Module._extensions..js (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:790:10)
at Module.load (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:642:32)
at Function.Module._load (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:555:12)
at Function.Module.runMain (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:842:10)
at internal/main/run_main_module.js:17:11
-bash-4.2$
I'll see what we can do to make this better.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Trott Changed this so that it now starts at the section header, which is less likely to change. PTAL.
(Test now still works when the prose is changed to "Valid options are:" but I'll let you make that change.)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since HTML comments are valid Markdown, maybe we can delineate the list with a self-documenting HTML comment and use a RegExp to search for that? A suggestion, but totally not blocking this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Added HTML comment markers. PTAL.
Of course now we have markers the follow on step would be to automatically update the list (since Node.js know which options are allowed in the environment and we've marked in the document where the lists should go). I'd prefer that to be a follow on PR 😁.
5557153
to
8917655
Compare
8917655
to
7b41260
Compare
One more thought: we might also validate the correct documentation order. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Add missing options to the list of allowed options for the `NODE_OPTIONS` environment variable. Sort the list alphabetically.
Add a test that checks that the documented allowed options for the `NODE_OPTIONS` environment variable are consistent with the actually allowed options.
7b41260
to
6bfc840
Compare
@BridgeAR After changing the test and documentation to use markers to denote where to parse the options from the documentation this ended up being much easier so I've updated the test to check the options are alphabetically sorted. |
A lint rule might be better? |
The node binary running the linter may not be the same as the one corresponding to the source tree. However I won't stand in the way if anyone else wants to attempt this as a lint rule. |
Landed in 3cdd5a2...5225586 |
Add missing options to the list of allowed options for the `NODE_OPTIONS` environment variable. Sort the list alphabetically. PR-URL: nodejs#28179 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Add a test that checks that the documented allowed options for the `NODE_OPTIONS` environment variable are consistent with the actually allowed options. PR-URL: nodejs#28179 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Add missing options to the list of allowed options for the `NODE_OPTIONS` environment variable. Sort the list alphabetically. PR-URL: #28179 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Add a test that checks that the documented allowed options for the `NODE_OPTIONS` environment variable are consistent with the actually allowed options. PR-URL: #28179 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Add missing options to the list of allowed options for the `NODE_OPTIONS` environment variable. Sort the list alphabetically. PR-URL: #28179 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Add a test that checks that the documented allowed options for the `NODE_OPTIONS` environment variable are consistent with the actually allowed options. PR-URL: #28179 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
doc: add missing options allowed in NODE_OPTIONS
Add missing options to the list of allowed options for the
NODE_OPTIONS
environment variable. Sort the list alphabetically.doc,test: test documentation consistency for NODE_OPTIONS
Add a test that checks that the documented allowed options for the
NODE_OPTIONS
environment variable are consistent with the actuallyallowed options.
Checklist
make -j4 test
(UNIX), orvcbuild test
(Windows) passes