Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

deps: v8 build on FreeBSD 10.2 #2636

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
+3 −2
Closed

deps: v8 build on FreeBSD 10.2 #2636

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions deps/v8/AUTHORS
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu <kennyluck@csail.mit.edu>
Luis Reis <luis.m.reis@gmail.com>
Luke Zarko <lukezarko@gmail.com>
Maciej Małecki <me@mmalecki.com>
Marcin Cieślak <saper@marcincieslak.com>
Mathias Bynens <mathias@qiwi.be>
Matt Hanselman <mjhanselman@gmail.com>
Matthew Sporleder <msporleder@gmail.com>
Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion deps/v8/src/runtime/runtime-i18n.cc
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -627,7 +627,7 @@ RUNTIME_FUNCTION(Runtime_CreateBreakIterator) {

local_object->SetInternalField(0, reinterpret_cast<Smi*>(break_iterator));
// Make sure that the pointer to adopted text is NULL.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This says NULL. Is that okay?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

NULL is just 0 with a nullptr_t type, which clang complains about. I didn't change the comment, because semantically, I thought that was still more meaningful; I've always thought of NULL as void *, but these days it's more fancy.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Note that the comments above applied to my original rejected patch to 0, rather than upstream cherry pick, which went with static_cast instead of reinterpret_cast and nullptr for 0.

local_object->SetInternalField(1, reinterpret_cast<Smi*>(NULL));
local_object->SetInternalField(1, static_cast<Smi*>(nullptr));

Factory* factory = isolate->factory();
Handle<String> key = factory->NewStringFromStaticChars("breakIterator");
Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion deps/v8/test/cctest/test-heap.cc
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ TEST(HandleNull) {
Isolate* isolate = CcTest::i_isolate();
HandleScope outer_scope(isolate);
LocalContext context;
Handle<Object> n(reinterpret_cast<Object*>(NULL), isolate);
Handle<Object> n(static_cast<Object*>(nullptr), isolate);
CHECK(!n.is_null());
}

Expand Down