Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

util: remove todo #24982

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

util: remove todo #24982

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

BridgeAR
Copy link
Member

Most people are going to use the existing option and switching the
name now comes with a cost which does not seem to justify the
improvement.

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • tests and/or benchmarks are included
  • documentation is changed or added
  • commit message follows commit guidelines

Most people are going to use the existing option and switching the
name now comes with a cost which does not seem to justify the
improvement.
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the util Issues and PRs related to the built-in util module. label Dec 12, 2018
@BridgeAR BridgeAR added the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Dec 12, 2018
@Trott
Copy link
Member

Trott commented Dec 15, 2018

Landed in 885de1b

@Trott Trott closed this Dec 15, 2018
Trott pushed a commit to Trott/io.js that referenced this pull request Dec 15, 2018
Most people are going to use the existing option and switching the
name now comes with a cost which does not seem to justify the
improvement.

PR-URL: nodejs#24982
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anto Aravinth <anto.aravinth.cse@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
BethGriggs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 18, 2018
Most people are going to use the existing option and switching the
name now comes with a cost which does not seem to justify the
improvement.

PR-URL: #24982
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anto Aravinth <anto.aravinth.cse@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
@BethGriggs BethGriggs mentioned this pull request Dec 18, 2018
sagitsofan pushed a commit to sagitsofan/node that referenced this pull request Dec 24, 2018
Most people are going to use the existing option and switching the
name now comes with a cost which does not seem to justify the
improvement.

PR-URL: nodejs#24982
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anto Aravinth <anto.aravinth.cse@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
refack pushed a commit to refack/node that referenced this pull request Jan 14, 2019
Most people are going to use the existing option and switching the
name now comes with a cost which does not seem to justify the
improvement.

PR-URL: nodejs#24982
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anto Aravinth <anto.aravinth.cse@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
BethGriggs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 14, 2019
Most people are going to use the existing option and switching the
name now comes with a cost which does not seem to justify the
improvement.

PR-URL: #24982
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anto Aravinth <anto.aravinth.cse@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
@BethGriggs BethGriggs mentioned this pull request May 1, 2019
@BridgeAR BridgeAR deleted the remove-todos branch January 20, 2020 11:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. util Issues and PRs related to the built-in util module.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants