doc: mention smart pointers in Cpp style guide #17055
Conversation
fhinkel
added
the
c++
CPP_STYLE_GUIDE.md
Outdated
| @@ -1,5 +1,23 @@ | |||
| # C++ Style Guide | |||
|
|
|||
| ## Table of Contents | |||
|
|
|||
| * [Left-leaning (C++ style) asterisks for pointer declarations](#left-leaning-c-style-asterisks-for-pointer-declarations) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Not really need to be done in this PR, but we should probably put these rules into different categories so they would be easier to look up
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Oh, I think #17052 is actually adding ToC there, maybe this PR should not include that change?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
That's kind of why I added a Table of Contents, so folks get an idea of all the rules even if they don't scroll all the way to the bottom. If anybody has a good idea how to order them, I'm all for it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ideally, we have a linter that enforces all the rules 🤣
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@fhinkel Yes, but an easy-to-extend and easy-to-use C++ linter is not easy to come by as their JavaScript counterparts.. I've been looking into clang-tidy while working on #16122, but that requires a compilation database, we do have ninja support that can emit those, still it probably raise the barrier of entry too high for new contributors..
Add rule for smart pointers, i.e., std::unique_ptr and std::shared_ptr, to the Cpp style guide. Mostly copied from the Google style guide.
fhinkel
force-pushed
the
nov/smart-pointer-guide
branch
from
e5cf1c6 to
adadaf8
Compare
|
Landed in 0e1abb1. |
Add rule for smart pointers, i.e., std::unique_ptr and std::shared_ptr, to the Cpp style guide. Mostly copied from the Google style guide. PR-URL: #17055 Ref: #16970 Ref: #16974 Ref: #17000 Ref: #17012 Ref: #17020 Ref: #17030 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Add rule for smart pointers, i.e., std::unique_ptr and std::shared_ptr, to the Cpp style guide. Mostly copied from the Google style guide. PR-URL: #17055 Ref: #16970 Ref: #16974 Ref: #17000 Ref: #17012 Ref: #17020 Ref: #17030 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Add rule for smart pointers, i.e., std::unique_ptr and std::shared_ptr, to the Cpp style guide. Mostly copied from the Google style guide. PR-URL: #17055 Ref: #16970 Ref: #16974 Ref: #17000 Ref: #17012 Ref: #17020 Ref: #17030 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Add rule for smart pointers, i.e., std::unique_ptr and std::shared_ptr, to the Cpp style guide. Mostly copied from the Google style guide. PR-URL: #17055 Ref: #16970 Ref: #16974 Ref: #17000 Ref: #17012 Ref: #17020 Ref: #17030 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Add rule for smart pointers, i.e., std::unique_ptr and std::shared_ptr,
to the Cpp style guide. Mostly copied from the Google style guide.
I started changing raw pointers to smart pointers in several C++ files.
std::unique_ptr has almost no overhead compared to raw pointers
and makes the code less error-prone. Are there any objections to
adding the usage of smart pointers as a rule to our style guide?
Ref: #16970
Ref: #16974
Ref: #17000
Ref: #17012
Ref: #17020
Ref: #17030
Checklist
Affected core subsystem(s)
doc
This needs to be rebased after #17052 lands (should only be the second commit).