-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fs: add access() and accessSync() #114
Conversation
For @caineio
|
Sorry, but something is not right here:
|
@cjihrig just a moment, I'll add the rest of core modules :) |
Hello! I am pleased to see your valuable contribution to this project. Would you Questions:
Please provide the answers in an ordered list like this:
Note that I am just a bot with a limited human-reply parsing abilities, In case of success I will say: In case of validation problem I will say: Truly yours, Responsibilities
|
@cjihrig should work now ;) |
For @caineio
|
...summoning the core team devs! |
fs.exists()
andfs.existsSync()
do not follow typical node conventions.fs.access()
andfs.accessSync()
are added as alternatives in this commit.This is the first part of #103. The second part is actually deprecating
exists()
andexistsSync()
. This PR is equivalent to nodejs/node-v0.x-archive#8714