-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Propose v3.3.2 #956
Comments
+1
After this I reckon we should bump to v4 and get rid of the NVM env stuff. |
It looks like #915 has landed, but #955 is still pending. I would like to point out that once VS 2015 Update 3 hits RTM (it's currently in RC), we are probably going to get a lot of bug reports because of #949 (which is fixed by f31482e226). This release (or at least f31482e226) will need to be propagated to all of Node release lines. |
v3.4.0 published, changelog @ https://github.com/nodejs/node-gyp/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md |
Just a heads up - AppVeyor has made VS2015 Update 3 available on their default images, and with the use of Node v6.2.2 it is now encountering the issue logged in #949, causing anything which depends on node-gyp v3.3.1 (in my case,
Are there any known workarounds to get up to |
@shiftkey Untested, but I would expect that you can |
@bnoordhuis thanks for the suggestion, but sadly that - whether providing |
@shiftkey you're going to have to be patient for this process to work itself out. We have it going in to the next npm releases (already in npm@2 to be released next week, in the process of getting in to npm@3) and then after that it'll have to come across to node for inclusion in a new release. When it's in npm you should be able to manually upgrade npm to make it work and not have to wait for Node to upgrade it's npm but you'll have to keep an eye on npm/npm#13199 & npm/npm#13200. |
@shiftkey As a workaround I can propose this:
Relating SO Quesion |
It's been a while, we should get the fixes in the wild.
Just doing this here to make sure there weren't any loose ends to clean up and that 3.3.2 would be the correct version.
cc @bnoordhuis / @orangemocha
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: