-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 78
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
adding minutes from 2018-10-01 meeting (#137)
- Loading branch information
1 parent
a8add11
commit 41cde94
Showing
1 changed file
with
94 additions
and
0 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@ | ||
# Node.js Foundation Diagnostics Working Group Meeting 2018-01-10 Minutes | ||
|
||
|
||
## Attendees | ||
|
||
- @mike-kaufman | ||
- @qard(Stephen Belanger) | ||
- @AndreasMadsen | ||
- @danielkhan | ||
- @jankrems | ||
- @kjin | ||
- @ofrobots | ||
- @dominicdkramer | ||
- @mhdawson | ||
|
||
## Links | ||
|
||
* **This Meeting**: | ||
* Minutes: https://github.com/nodejs/diagnostics/blob/master/wg-meetings/2018-01-10.md | ||
* Notes: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Zb92YTZQWf8i73UrRfusID7zfLtAcjYvmqUBDbORsOE/edit | ||
* You Tube: N/A | ||
* **Previous Meeting**: | ||
* Minutes: https://github.com/nodejs/diagnostics/blob/master/wg-meetings/2017-12-13.md | ||
* Notes: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZkTGBUk5lgodtwtlY_0eoInpctVGpf6ofB5TyUF0hqs/edit?usp=sharing | ||
|
||
## Notes | ||
|
||
### nodejs/node | ||
|
||
* Integrate C++ AsyncHooks Embedder API with native abstraction [#13254](https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/13254) | ||
- issue is stalled | ||
- how do we communicate this with a broader group? | ||
- **Actions** | ||
- [ ] @ofrobots volunteered to look into this | ||
|
||
### nodejs/diagnostics | ||
|
||
* \[async-hooks\] request for feedback [#129](https://github.com/nodejs/diagnostics/issues/129) | ||
- Do we have enough feedback & is it useful? | ||
- [bluebird issue #1472](https://github.com/petkaantonov/bluebird/pull/1472) on perforance of async hooks is related to this. | ||
- @danielkhan - they're support down to node v4, and haven't had time to invest in a 8.x/9.x solution only - their monkey-patching still works | ||
- @ofrobots - want to know if API is stable & useful | ||
- **Actions** | ||
- [ ] @mike-kaufman - summarize feedback in here & roll it into [async_hooks] stable API - tracking issue [#124](https://github.com/nodejs/diagnostics/issues/124) | ||
|
||
* \[async_hooks\] stable API - tracking issue [#124](https://github.com/nodejs/diagnostics/issues/124) | ||
- should merge in summarized info from #129 | ||
|
||
* Diagnostics WG Summit - Feb 12-13, 2018 - Ottawa, ON Canada [#121](https://github.com/nodejs/diagnostics/issues/121) | ||
- Do we want to get to next level of detail on agenda items? | ||
- existing open work items? | ||
- common themes? | ||
- expected outcomes/results from summit? | ||
- Do we have a large node user attending? e.g., netflix? | ||
- belief is we do, but if anyone thinks someone's presence is valuable, they should invite them. | ||
- @mhdawson - "bring your coat" | ||
- **Actions** | ||
- [ ] @danielkhan - pick one of the agenda items & see if you can add next level detail/clarity based on your company's internal discussions. | ||
- [ ] @mike-kaufman - pick one of the agenda items & see if you can add next level detail/clarity. | ||
|
||
* Async-context formalization and diagnostics support [#107](https://github.com/nodejs/diagnostics/issues/107) | ||
- progress is being made in write-up | ||
- current plan is to use jsav.io to visualize DAG state transitions. | ||
- feel free to provide feedback on doc. | ||
|
||
* \[trace_event\] tracking issue [#84](https://github.com/nodejs/diagnostics/issues/84) | ||
- APIs for new timestamp macros being worked on by @ofrobots. | ||
- should land in v8 next couple of weeks | ||
- potential disconnect between perf_hooks & trave_events | ||
- @jasnell is working on some perf-hooks instrumentation that is similiar to browser peformance APIs | ||
- @AndreasMadsen thinks there's impedence mis-match between two API sets | ||
- @ofrobots believes gap here is because of timestamp macros | ||
- **Actions**: | ||
- [x] @AndreasMadsen to update Diag Summit agenda w/ item to discuss perf_hooks vs trace_events | ||
|
||
* Get out of monkey patching [#134](https://github.com/nodejs/diagnostics/issues/134) | ||
- there's open-census & open-tracing efforts, that are related, yet different | ||
- looks like some things are lining up w/ open-census effort | ||
- we need more clarity on details | ||
- **Actions** | ||
- [ ] @mike-kaufman - update issue to clarify use cases to ensure we're all on same page | ||
|
||
### nodejs/benchmarking | ||
|
||
* Perf/Node.js [#168](https://github.com/nodejs/benchmarking/issues/168) | ||
- flame graphs still broken | ||
- tooling stability is on agenda for summit | ||
|
||
### nodejs/post-mortem | ||
|
||
* Meta data for llnode - Node.js version 8 [#50](https://github.com/nodejs/post-mortem/issues/50) | ||
- Problem here was mdb, not llnode | ||
- a test was added node to identify cases when metadata gets out of sync | ||
- not ready to close this issue just yet. |