-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
unify explicit generic param semchecking in calls #22618
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Thanks for your hard work on this PR! Hint: mm: orc; opt: speed; options: -d:release |
narimiran
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 12, 2023
narimiran
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 12, 2023
narimiran
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 12, 2023
narimiran
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 18, 2023
narimiran
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 18, 2023
narimiran
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 18, 2023
Araq
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 9, 2024
Caught in https://github.com/metagn/applicates, I'm not sure which commit causes this but it's also in the 2.0 branch (but not 2.0.2), so it's not any recent PRs. If a proc has a static parameter with type `static Foo[T]`, then another parameter with type `static Bar[T, U]`, the generic instantiation for `Bar` doesn't match `U` which has type `tyGenericParam`, but matches `T` since it has type `tyTypeDesc`. The reason is that `concreteType` returns the type itself for `tyTypeDesc` if `c.isNoCall` (i.e. matching a generic invocation), but returns `nil` for `tyGenericParam`. I'm guessing `tyGenericParam` is received here because of #22618, but that doesn't explain why `T` is still `tyTypeDesc`. I'm not sure. Regardless, we can just copy the behavior for `tyTypeDesc` to `tyGenericParam` and also return the type itself when `c.isNoCall`. This feels like it defeats the purpose of `concreteType` but the way it's used doesn't make sense without it (generic param can't match another generic param?). Alternatively we could loosen the `if concrete == nil: return isNone` checks in some places for specific conditions, whether `c.isNoCall` or `c.inGenericContext == 0` (though this would need #24005).
narimiran
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 16, 2024
Caught in https://github.com/metagn/applicates, I'm not sure which commit causes this but it's also in the 2.0 branch (but not 2.0.2), so it's not any recent PRs. If a proc has a static parameter with type `static Foo[T]`, then another parameter with type `static Bar[T, U]`, the generic instantiation for `Bar` doesn't match `U` which has type `tyGenericParam`, but matches `T` since it has type `tyTypeDesc`. The reason is that `concreteType` returns the type itself for `tyTypeDesc` if `c.isNoCall` (i.e. matching a generic invocation), but returns `nil` for `tyGenericParam`. I'm guessing `tyGenericParam` is received here because of #22618, but that doesn't explain why `T` is still `tyTypeDesc`. I'm not sure. Regardless, we can just copy the behavior for `tyTypeDesc` to `tyGenericParam` and also return the type itself when `c.isNoCall`. This feels like it defeats the purpose of `concreteType` but the way it's used doesn't make sense without it (generic param can't match another generic param?). Alternatively we could loosen the `if concrete == nil: return isNone` checks in some places for specific conditions, whether `c.isNoCall` or `c.inGenericContext == 0` (though this would need (cherry picked from commit 24e5b21)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
fixes #9040