Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

travis: cleanup & add 32-bit Linux testing #11337

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
May 30, 2019

Conversation

alaviss
Copy link
Collaborator

@alaviss alaviss commented May 27, 2019

Currently 32-bit Linux doesn't bootstrap. I don't know if it's my fault or devel got a regression.

EDIT: Tested with a known good config, this is a devel regression caused by 3a06022

Bonus goodies:

  • after_failure is now triggered correctly and will print out a nice summary of failed tests.

/cc @Araq

@alaviss alaviss force-pushed the travis-32bit branch 5 times, most recently from 941887d to b1f997f Compare May 27, 2019 11:34
@alaviss alaviss force-pushed the travis-32bit branch 3 times, most recently from 596ce0e to d72f876 Compare May 28, 2019 01:25
@narimiran narimiran closed this May 28, 2019
@narimiran narimiran reopened this May 28, 2019
alaviss added 5 commits May 29, 2019 09:54
Having `set -e` broke `after_failure`. This commit removes them where
appropriate.

According to https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/job-lifecycle#breaking-the-build,
only the script phase ignore errors, but it's totally harmless in this case.
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ proc `@`[IDX, T](a: array[IDX, T]): seq[T]

expression: @[int]
'''
disabled: "32bit"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Due to this one new line, change lines 3-5 from 15 to 16:

line: 16
nimout: '''
twrong_at_operator.nim(16, 30) Error: type mismatch: got <array[0..0, type int]>

@narimiran narimiran merged commit 1d00f7f into nim-lang:devel May 30, 2019
@alaviss alaviss deleted the travis-32bit branch May 30, 2019 06:08
@timotheecour timotheecour mentioned this pull request Mar 11, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants