Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(eslint-plugin): add new rule require-super-ondestroy #4611
feat(eslint-plugin): add new rule require-super-ondestroy #4611
Changes from all commits
216d7d7
0726d1c
bcbc64b
b31952c
2c1fd97
c9379a3
c0fb1d3
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this uses
:has
- which is technically supported by the underlyingesquery
, but is not officially supported byeslint
. It's not mentioned in the docs here, and also see this issue: eslint/eslint#14076 (comment).do you think this approach is reasonably future-proof?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was not aware of this - doesn't seem like support for it would be dropped, but maybe it's safer to use another approach.
@timdeschryver If I wanted to make a PR with an alternative to using
:has
, what would be the best way - should we create a new issue and I make a bugfix PR referencing it, or some other way?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I prefer to keep it as-is.
There are multiple rules using
:has
, and I like it because it's easy to read.If it does become deprecated/removed in the future we can update it.