Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix CI with new MultiQC version in minimal example #82

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 6, 2018
Merged

fix CI with new MultiQC version in minimal example #82

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 6, 2018

Conversation

maxulysse
Copy link
Member

Update MultiQC version in miminal example to fix CI on nf-core tools

@maxulysse maxulysse requested review from sven1103 and a team and removed request for sven1103 August 6, 2018 13:19
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Aug 6, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #82 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master      #82   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.31%   95.31%           
=======================================
  Files           6        6           
  Lines         661      661           
=======================================
  Hits          630      630           
  Misses         31       31

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update cf80242...a58a4cb. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Member

@ewels ewels left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry about this 👍

@ewels ewels merged commit 7ae0156 into nf-core:master Aug 6, 2018
@maxulysse
Copy link
Member Author

np, sorry about pushing on master...

@ewels
Copy link
Member

ewels commented Aug 10, 2018

Reverting this to keep master clean. Pretty sure it was fixed elsewhere in another PR on dev.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants