modify template to use nf-validation plugin #1771
Conversation
mirpedrol
force-pushed
the
schema-validation
branch
from
ed1ca1e to
691720b
Compare
mirpedrol
force-pushed
the
schema-validation
branch
from
6184747 to
c623783
Compare
|
<3 |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## dev #1771 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 72.93% 72.75% -0.18%
==========================================
Files 77 77
Lines 8446 8446
==========================================
- Hits 6160 6145 -15
- Misses 2286 2301 +15
|
| @@ -11,6 +11,8 @@ | |||
| - Move registry definitions out of profile scope ([#2286])(https://github.com/nf-core/tools/pull/2286) | |||
| - Remove `aws_tower` profile ([#2287])(https://github.com/nf-core/tools/pull/2287) | |||
| - Fixed the Slack report to include the pipeline name ([#2291](https://github.com/nf-core/tools/pull/2291)) | |||
| - Remove shcema validation from `lib` folder and use Nextflow nf-validation plugin instead ([#1771](https://github.com/nf-core/tools/pull/1771/)) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| - Remove shcema validation from `lib` folder and use Nextflow nf-validation plugin instead ([#1771](https://github.com/nf-core/tools/pull/1771/)) | |
| - Remove schema validation from `lib` folder and use Nextflow nf-validation plugin instead ([#1771](https://github.com/nf-core/tools/pull/1771/)) |
| // Schema validation default options | ||
| validationFailUnrecognisedParams = false | ||
| validationLenientMode = false | ||
| validate_params = true |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should we also make them camel-case?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm doubting with validate_params. For schema_ignore_params you are right, it should be camelCase as it's part of the nf-validation plugin. But validate_params is only used in nf-core pipelines, so I think it should be snake_case?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
if it's params, then snake_case
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Unfortunately the nf-validation plugin is using camelCase as nextflow uses this notation, and it's ment to be for all NF pipelines and not only nf-core.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Good point, then ok for camelCase
|
Converting it to a draft again as, after some Slack discussions, we've decided to not include |
…link from singularity to apptainer on the system.
Co-authored-by: Matthias Hörtenhuber <mashehu@users.noreply.github.com>
… to Version 2.9dev.
…n showing it separately.
Co-authored-by: Matthias Hörtenhuber <mashehu@users.noreply.github.com>
…onal for Tower downloads. Given that there is the option to provide the list of remote containers to skip their download, I agree that this is reasonable.
…revisions may also be branches. Therefore, I rewrote this function to account for revisions that are not releases.
|
I messed up this PR too much, so I've decided to open a new one #2300 |
Closes #1543
The validation of nextflow_schema.json files from nf-core pipelines is now part of a core Nextflow plugin: nextflow-io/nf-validation#5
Test in nf-core/testpipeline
Functions can be imported to a pipeline with
include { paramsHelp, paramsSummaryMap, paramsSummaryLog } from 'plugin/nf-validation'Schema validation code from the pipeline template
NfcoreSchema.groovyandMainWorkflow.groovyis removed.Validate a sample sheet with a JSON schema and create a channel from it. Replaces
check_samplesheetsubworkflow and code.PR checklist
CHANGELOG.mdis updateddocsis updated