-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 420
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Created subworkflow for parsing samplesheet with nf-test #1286
Conversation
Fixes #1285 |
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
looks great ! Thank you so much 🙏 just testing it quickly on the cluster, always scared when we change the sample sheet parsing :D
file('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/nf-core/test-datasets/modules/data/genomics/homo_sapiens/illumina/fastq/test_1.fastq.gz'), | ||
file('https://raw.githubusercontent.com/nf-core/test-datasets/modules/data/genomics/homo_sapiens/illumina/fastq/test_2.fastq.gz'), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
if we use test_cache profile, then we can use the map from https://github.com/nf-core/test-datasets/blob/sarek3/tests/config/test_data.config
Looking amazingly good, we'd just need to add nf-test in the .github/workflows/ci.yml. @adamrtalbot any idea to make it work while we still have pytest tests with tags.yml? |
@maxulysse @RaqManzano could one of you update from dev? I don't seem to be able to. Not sure why not. |
Co-authored-by: Friederike Hanssen <Friederike.hanssen@qbic.uni-tuebingen.de>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
❤️
Generated a new subworkflow for parsing samplesheet with its corresponding nf-test.