Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Remove stylistic rules #101

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 6, 2024
Merged

fix: Remove stylistic rules #101

merged 1 commit into from
May 6, 2024

Conversation

susnux
Copy link
Contributor

@susnux susnux commented May 4, 2024

With stylelint 16 stylistic rules were dropped and we recommended using prettier. But we include the scss plugin which still has stylelistic rules that conflict. So also disable those rules.

With stylelint 16 stylistic rules were dropped and we recommended using prettier.
But we include the scss plugin which still has stylelistic rules that conflict.
So also disable those rules.

Signed-off-by: Ferdinand Thiessen <opensource@fthiessen.de>
@susnux susnux added the 3. to review Waiting for reviews label May 4, 2024
@susnux susnux requested review from skjnldsv, Pytal and ShGKme May 4, 2024 12:59
@susnux susnux added the bug Something isn't working label May 4, 2024
Comment on lines +8 to +11
// Stylistic rules conflicting with prettier
'scss/operator-no-newline-after': null,
'scss/operator-no-newline-before': null,

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Isn't scss/operator-no-unspaced a formatting rule as well?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah yes right, but at least not conflicting

@susnux susnux merged commit d067ae3 into main May 6, 2024
6 checks passed
@susnux susnux deleted the fix/stylistic-rules branch May 6, 2024 13:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
3. to review Waiting for reviews bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants