yield_resume: stabilize

[nagisa]

I believe I missed nothing, but let me know if I did.

cc @posvyatokum

[saketh-are]

LGTM. There is one small thing here:

nearcore/core/store/src/trie/resharding.rs

Lines 343 to 349 in 92ee5d2

	// TODO: we can remove this check once yield execution is stabilized.
	// For now it prevents populating promise yield indices for the child shards with default
	// values if the feature has not been enabled.
	if insert_timeouts.is_empty() && delete_timeouts.is_empty() {
	return Ok(());
	}

I'd propose just deleting those 7 lines.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 70.97%. Comparing base (92ee5d2) to head (f6916c1).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master   #11277   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   70.96%   70.97%           
=======================================
  Files         781      781           
  Lines      155420   155417    -3     
  Branches   155420   155417    -3     
=======================================
+ Hits       110301   110305    +4     
- Misses      40349    40356    +7     
+ Partials     4770     4756   -14     

Flag	Coverage Δ
backward-compatibility	0.24% <0.00%> (ø)
db-migration	0.24% <0.00%> (ø)
genesis-check	1.40% <0.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
integration-tests	37.13% <100.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
linux	69.04% <100.00%> (+0.16%)	⬆️
linux-nightly	70.44% <100.00%> (+0.02%)	⬆️
macos	52.46% <100.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
pytests	1.63% <0.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
sanity-checks	1.42% <0.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
unittests	65.41% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
upgradability	0.29% <0.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.