Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use popOne in JS API routed request workers #6355

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 9, 2025
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
7 changes: 4 additions & 3 deletions server/jetstream_api.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -922,8 +922,10 @@ func (s *Server) processJSAPIRoutedRequests() {
for {
select {
case <-queue.ch:
reqs := queue.pop()
for _, r := range reqs {
// Only pop one item at a time here, otherwise if the system is recovering
// from queue buildup, then one worker will pull off all the tasks and the
// others will be starved of work.
for r, ok := queue.popOne(); ok && r != nil; r, ok = queue.popOne() {
client.pa = r.pa
start := time.Now()
r.jsub.icb(r.sub, client, r.acc, r.subject, r.reply, r.msg)
Expand All @@ -932,7 +934,6 @@ func (s *Server) processJSAPIRoutedRequests() {
}
atomic.AddInt64(&js.apiInflight, -1)
}
queue.recycle(&reqs)
derekcollison marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
case <-s.quitCh:
return
}
Expand Down
66 changes: 66 additions & 0 deletions server/jetstream_cluster_4_test.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -5265,3 +5265,69 @@ func TestJetStreamClusterOnlyPublishAdvisoriesWhenInterest(t *testing.T) {
// it should succeed.
require_True(t, s1.publishAdvisory(s1.GlobalAccount(), subj, "test"))
}

func TestJetStreamClusterRoutedAPIRecoverPerformance(t *testing.T) {
c := createJetStreamClusterExplicit(t, "R3S", 3)
defer c.shutdown()

nc, _ := jsClientConnect(t, c.randomNonLeader())
defer nc.Close()

// We only run 16 JetStream API workers.
mp := runtime.GOMAXPROCS(0)
if mp > 16 {
mp = 16
}

leader := c.leader()
ljs := leader.js.Load()

// Take the JS lock, which allows the JS API queue to build up.
ljs.mu.Lock()
defer ljs.mu.Unlock()

count := JSDefaultRequestQueueLimit - 1
ch := make(chan *nats.Msg, count)

inbox := nc.NewRespInbox()
_, err := nc.ChanSubscribe(inbox, ch)
require_NoError(t, err)

// To ensure a fair starting line, we need to submit as many tasks as
// there are JS workers whilst holding the JS lock. This will ensure that
// each JS API worker is properly wedged.
msg := &nats.Msg{
Subject: fmt.Sprintf(JSApiConsumerInfoT, "Doesnt", "Exist"),
Reply: "no_one_here",
}
for i := 0; i < mp; i++ {
require_NoError(t, nc.PublishMsg(msg))
}

// Then we want to submit a fixed number of tasks, big enough to fill
// the queue, so that we can measure them.
msg = &nats.Msg{
Subject: fmt.Sprintf(JSApiConsumerInfoT, "Doesnt", "Exist"),
Reply: inbox,
}
for i := 0; i < count; i++ {
require_NoError(t, nc.PublishMsg(msg))
}
checkFor(t, 5*time.Second, 25*time.Millisecond, func() error {
if queued := leader.jsAPIRoutedReqs.len(); queued != count {
return fmt.Errorf("expected %d queued requests, got %d", count, queued)
}
return nil
})

// Now we're going to release the lock and start timing. The workers
// will now race to clear the queues and we'll wait to see how long
// it takes for them all to respond.
start := time.Now()
ljs.mu.Unlock()
for i := 0; i < count; i++ {
<-ch
}
ljs.mu.Lock()
t.Logf("Took %s to clear %d items", time.Since(start), count)
}
Loading