Fix #1304, locks for condvar objects on rtems/vxworks #1311
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Checklist (Please check before submitting)
Describe the contribution
Instantiate the condvar lock on rtems and vxworks even though the feature is not currently implemented. This is because OS_MAX_CONDVARS must still be nonzero and if the "Create" function is called, it still goes through the motions of allocating an ID.
This also adds a NULL check in the lock implementation, and thus if a lock is not instantiated in the future this will not dereference a NULL pointer.
Fixes #1304
Testing performed
Build and run all tests
Expected behavior changes
Missing lock is instantiated
Add null check - Avoids possible null dereference in the event of a missing lock in the future
System(s) tested on
Ubuntu 22.04
Contributor Info - All information REQUIRED for consideration of pull request
Joseph Hickey, Vantage Systems, Inc.