Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a github actions workflow to replace travis CI #161

Closed
astrogeco opened this issue Dec 9, 2020 · 0 comments · Fixed by #159
Closed

Add a github actions workflow to replace travis CI #161

astrogeco opened this issue Dec 9, 2020 · 0 comments · Fixed by #159

Comments

@astrogeco
Copy link
Contributor

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Travis CI billing change is hindering our continuous integration flows

Describe the solution you'd like
A service that doesn't limit our runs

Describe alternatives you've considered
Running all tests locally, paying for Travis or another service

Additional context
None

@astrogeco astrogeco linked a pull request Dec 9, 2020 that will close this issue
@astrogeco astrogeco added this to the Caelum cFS-20.12 milestone Dec 9, 2020
astrogeco added a commit to astrogeco/cFS that referenced this issue Dec 9, 2020
Create three separate workflows. The build-cfs and build-cfs-deprecated workflows
differ only by the OMIT_DEPRECATED flag status.
The build-documentation workflow only builds the doxygen docs.
astrogeco added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 9, 2020
Create three separate workflows. The build-cfs and build-cfs-deprecated workflows
differ only by the OMIT_DEPRECATED flag status.
The build-documentation workflow only builds the doxygen docs.
chillfig pushed a commit to chillfig/cFS that referenced this issue Mar 17, 2022
Restores setting a global flag which was mistakenly deleted
in a previous cleanup.
chillfig pushed a commit to chillfig/cFS that referenced this issue Mar 17, 2022
Fix nasa#161, disable the engine in CF_CFDP_DisableEngine
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant