Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add from_arrow (which uses the PyCapsule Interface) #1181

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Oct 17, 2024

Conversation

MarcoGorelli
Copy link
Member

closes #1158

What type of PR is this? (check all applicable)

  • πŸ’Ύ Refactor
  • ✨ Feature
  • πŸ› Bug Fix
  • πŸ”§ Optimization
  • πŸ“ Documentation
  • βœ… Test
  • 🐳 Other

Related issues

  • Related issue #
  • Closes #

Checklist

  • Code follows style guide (ruff)
  • Tests added
  • Documented the changes

If you have comments or can explain your changes, please do so below.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 15, 2024
@jonmmease
Copy link

Thanks @MarcoGorelli, this looks great!

Copy link
Contributor

@EdAbati EdAbati left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It looks πŸ‘ŒπŸ‘Œ, just added a minor comment about naming

@@ -406,6 +411,100 @@ def _from_dict_impl(
return from_native(native_frame, eager_only=True)


def from_pycapsule(
supports_py_capsule: SupportsPyCapsule, *, native_namespace: ModuleType
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I was wondering if we could rename this to somehting like py_capsule_obj or arrow_py_capsule_obj or similar

At first glance I thought this was a bool (True if something supports pycapsule) πŸ˜…

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

πŸ€” maybe this should just be native_frame?

Comment on lines 34 to 35
class SupportsPyCapsule(Protocol):
def __arrow_c_stream__(self) -> Any: ...

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link

@kylebarron kylebarron Oct 16, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I also personally stick with the upstream naming suggestion and call this ArrowStreamExportable https://github.com/kylebarron/arro3/blob/45be4a12dd62cee025c5d0ecf8c8c081e13643ea/arro3-core/python/arro3/core/types.py#L52-L75

@@ -406,6 +411,100 @@ def _from_dict_impl(
return from_native(native_frame, eager_only=True)


def from_pycapsule(

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Personally I'd call this from_arrow and under the hood use the PyCapsule Interface. I think the PyCapsule itself is an implementation detail, and not something the user should need to know about.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

based on pola-rs/polars#12530 (comment), i think this risks being confused with Polars' from_arrow, which does something different

i'd be more inclined to use from_pycapsule then

Copy link

@kylebarron kylebarron Oct 17, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you only have top-level functions? Do you export a DataFrame-like class? Why not put it on that class?

But there is a difference between yours and the polars function because your function seems to only convert to a DataFrame while the polars function tries to decide whether it should return a Series or DataFrame.

from_pycapsule still doesn't really resolve the ambiguity, but you could change it to from_arrow_dataframe or from_arrow_df or from_arrow_table.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks! yeah maybe class constructors are the way to go for this one

@MarcoGorelli MarcoGorelli changed the title feat: add from_pycapsule feat: add from_arrow (which uses the PyCapsule Interface) Oct 17, 2024
@MarcoGorelli
Copy link
Member Author

MarcoGorelli commented Oct 17, 2024

thanks @EdAbati and @kylebarron for reviews! πŸ™ any further comments?

@MarcoGorelli
Copy link
Member Author

gonna ship this so we can make a release, if there's issues we can always address as a follow-up (it's a new feature so it doesn't affect existing users) - thanks all for comments!

@MarcoGorelli MarcoGorelli merged commit 879d3cf into narwhals-dev:main Oct 17, 2024
27 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Enh]: Construct DataFrame from Arrow PyCapsule object
4 participants