Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: allow cutoff times per carrier #211

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 16, 2024

Conversation

joerivanveen
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@joerivanveen joerivanveen requested a review from a team as a code owner March 16, 2024 11:31
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 16, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 87.73%. Comparing base (cde3efe) to head (2a8fcae).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #211   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   87.73%   87.73%           
=======================================
  Files         194      194           
  Lines        1460     1460           
  Branches      226      226           
=======================================
  Hits         1281     1281           
  Misses        163      163           
  Partials       16       16           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@RichardPerdaan RichardPerdaan merged commit 418b55c into main Mar 16, 2024
6 checks passed
@RichardPerdaan RichardPerdaan deleted the fix/allow-cutoff-times-per-carrier branch March 16, 2024 11:40
MyParcelBot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 16, 2024
### [5.16.1](v5.16.0...v5.16.1) (2024-03-16)

### 🐛 Bug Fixes

* allow cutoff times per carrier ([#211](#211)) ([418b55c](418b55c))
@MyParcelBot
Copy link

🎉 This PR is included in version 5.16.1 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants