Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update babel-polyfill to version 6.9.0 🚀 #257

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 20, 2016

Conversation

greenkeeperio-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hello 👋

🚀🚀🚀

babel-polyfill just published its new version 6.9.0, which is not covered by your current version range.

If this pull request passes your tests you can publish your software with the latest version of babel-polyfill – otherwise use this branch to work on adaptions and fixes.

Happy fixing and merging 🌴


This pull request was created by greenkeeper.io.
It keeps your software up to date, all the time.

Tired of seeing this sponsor message? Upgrade to the supporter plan! You'll also get your pull requests faster ⚡

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented May 18, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 99.808% when pulling 6a9b9d4 on greenkeeper-babel-polyfill-6.9.0 into 2d442d7 on master.

@kumar303 kumar303 force-pushed the greenkeeper-babel-polyfill-6.9.0 branch from 6a9b9d4 to a3488ef Compare May 20, 2016 18:50
@kumar303 kumar303 force-pushed the greenkeeper-babel-polyfill-6.9.0 branch from a3488ef to db20e4b Compare May 20, 2016 18:50
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented May 20, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 99.808% when pulling db20e4b on greenkeeper-babel-polyfill-6.9.0 into b267cd7 on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented May 20, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 99.808% when pulling db20e4b on greenkeeper-babel-polyfill-6.9.0 into b267cd7 on master.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants