Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update redis to 3.2.0 #10714

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 18, 2019
Merged

Update redis to 3.2.0 #10714

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 18, 2019

Conversation

pyup-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR updates redis from 3.1.0 to 3.2.0.

Changelog

3.2.0

* Added support for `select.poll` to test whether data can be read
   on a socket. This should allow for significantly more connections to
   be used with pubsub. Fixes 486/1115
 * Attempt to guarentee that the ConnectionPool hands out healthy
   connections. Healthy connections are those that have an established
   socket connection to the Redis server, are ready to accept a command
   and have no data available to read. Fixes 1127/886
 * Use the socket.IPPROTO_TCP constant instead of socket.SOL_TCP.
   IPPROTO_TCP is available on more interpreters (Jython for instance).
   Thanks Junnplus. 1130
 * Fixed a regression introduced in 3.0 that mishandles exceptions not
   derived from the base Exception class. KeyboardInterrupt and
   gevent.timeout notable. Thanks Christian Fersch. 1128/1129
 * Significant improvements to handing connections with forked processes.
   Parent and child processes no longer trample on each others' connections.
   Thanks to Jay Rolette for the patch and highlighting this issue.
   504/732/784/863
 * PythonParser no longer closes the associated connection's socket. The
   connection itself will close the socket. 1108/1085
Links

@eviljeff eviljeff merged commit 0d58a1a into master Feb 18, 2019
@wagnerand wagnerand deleted the pyup-update-redis-3.1.0-to-3.2.0 branch July 2, 2019 14:45
MelissaAutumn pushed a commit to thunderbird/addons-server that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants