Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Unify timestampFormat parameter between Create*Mojo #86

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 11, 2018
Merged

Unify timestampFormat parameter between Create*Mojo #86

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 11, 2018

Conversation

TobiX
Copy link
Contributor

@TobiX TobiX commented Dec 10, 2018

This is a refresh of #41, so I kept the original commiter (and most of the original commit message) and retargeted to the current version. I also added a new integration test. Maybe @jgeorgeson wants to review this, too?

  • Update CreateMojo to use Utils.createTimestamp()
  • Check value of timestampFormat for MessageFormat style and
    warn/convert for backwards compatibility
  • Update IT projects with SimpleDateFormat style configuration for
    executions of create goal & add a new test to verify legacy behavior

(Fixes #40 & #41)

- Update CreateMojo to use Utils.createTimestamp()
- Check value of timestampFormat for MessageFormat style and
  warn/convert for backwards compatibility
- Update IT projects with SimpleDateFormat style configuration for
  executions of create goal & add a new test to verify legacy behavior

(Fixes #40 & #41)
@jgeorgeson
Copy link
Contributor

thanks!

@dantran dantran merged commit 17aa584 into mojohaus:master Dec 11, 2018
@TobiX TobiX deleted the create-use-simpledateformat branch January 21, 2019 10:29
@dantran dantran added this to the 3.0.0 milestone Feb 8, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Standardize MOJOs on SimpleDateFormat for timestampFormat
3 participants