Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updated DA Meeting notes #255

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 29, 2020
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
15 changes: 15 additions & 0 deletions meeting-notes/da-notes.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -5,6 +5,21 @@ The meetings are open for the public to participate, though discussions are usua

More details can be found [here](https://github.com/mojaloop/design-authority/issues/42#workspaces/da-issue-log-5cdd507422733779191866e9/board?notFullScreen=false&repos=186592307)

# DA Meeting - 26 August 2020
We discussed https://github.com/mojaloop/design-authority/issues/51 further on our DA Meeting on 26/08/2020.

Some of the key points were noted:

In order to take advantage of Typescript, and to help speed up development, the PISP workstream has gone ahead and separated out the thirdparty-scheme-adapter already.

One of the challenges identified with the "multi-scheme-adapter" approach was for cases where there are shared resources between the APIs, such as GET /parties/{type}/{id}.

Our decision to break the Thirdparty API into it's own API (and not extend the FSPIOP-API) was predicated on the idea that "not all participants will want thirdparty functions", and therefore shouldn't have to worry about them. As a part of the decision to keep a separate Thirdparty API, we decided that some resources would be duplicated between the two.

This could lead to problems down the line, where callbacks to some resources might not be able to reach their desired destination: for example if a DFSP needs to listen for PUT /parties/{type}/{id} callbacks for both the FSPIOP API and the Thirdparty API, it may not be possible for DFSPs to route such callbacks to the right place.

Lewis Daly will spend more time working on some diagrams and design documents, and come back to the DA shortly

# DA Meeting (Ad-Hoc) - 24 August 2020
The topic for discussion was: https://github.com/mojaloop/design-authority/issues/65
The Ad-Hoc meeting was conducted with a wider issue being addressed relating to recommendations required to be taken to the CCB for consideration to change/enhance the API spec.
Expand Down