remove image file when uploaded successfully #13
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@mohit2152sharma has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 16 minutes and 30 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces several enhancements across the project's database and utility functions. The changes include adding an Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant PostsService
participant FileSystem
participant BskyUploader
Client->>PostsService: Upload Post with Images
PostsService->>FileSystem: Generate Unique Image Filenames
PostsService->>BskyUploader: Upload Images
alt Upload Successful
BskyUploader-->>PostsService: Upload Confirmed
PostsService->>FileSystem: Remove Temporary Files
else Upload Failed
BskyUploader-->>PostsService: Upload Error
PostsService->>FileSystem: Remove Temporary Files
PostsService->>Client: Error Notification
end
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Coverage Report
File Coverage
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
src/lib/lib-utils.ts (1)
62-77: Add input validation for filePath parameterConsider adding validation for the
filePathparameter to ensure it's not empty or contains invalid characters.async function removeFile(filePath: string): Promise<void> { + if (!filePath?.trim()) { + throw new Error('File path cannot be empty'); + } try { logger.info(`Removing file ${filePath}`); await fs.unlink(filePath); } catch (e: unknown) {tests/utils/remove-file.test.ts (1)
6-42: Consider adding more edge cases to the test suiteThe current test coverage is good but could be enhanced with additional test cases:
- Empty or invalid file paths
- File permission errors (read-only files)
- Path traversal attempts
Example test case for empty path:
test('should throw error for empty file path', async () => { await expect(removeFile('')).rejects.toThrow('File path cannot be empty'); await expect(removeFile(' ')).rejects.toThrow('File path cannot be empty'); });src/lib/server/bsky/posts.ts (1)
111-111: Address the TODO comment about error handlingThe TODO comment indicates a known issue with error handling. Since we're already working on error-related changes, consider implementing proper error propagation now.
Would you like help implementing a comprehensive error handling solution that includes:
- Proper error types for different failure scenarios
- User-friendly error messages
- Error propagation to the UI
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
database/applied/prod/post.sql(1 hunks)src/lib/lib-utils.ts(2 hunks)src/lib/server/bsky/code-images.ts(2 hunks)src/lib/server/bsky/posts.ts(3 hunks)src/lib/server/bsky/threader.ts(1 hunks)src/lib/server/db/index.ts(3 hunks)tests/utils/remove-file.test.ts(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- src/lib/server/db/index.ts
🔇 Additional comments (6)
database/applied/prod/post.sql (1)
10-10: Consider data backfill strategy for existing rows
The updated_at column is added with a default value, but existing rows might need a backfill strategy. Consider adding a data migration step.
src/lib/lib-utils.ts (1)
79-81: LGTM! Clean type guard implementation.
The isNodeError type guard is well-implemented and follows TypeScript best practices.
tests/utils/remove-file.test.ts (1)
9-19: LGTM! Well-structured test setup and teardown.
The test file management using beforeAll and afterAll hooks ensures proper test isolation.
src/lib/server/bsky/code-images.ts (1)
5-7: LGTM: Logging enhancement
The addition of logging after successful image save is a good practice for monitoring and debugging purposes.
Also applies to: 96-96
src/lib/server/bsky/posts.ts (2)
71-85: Good: Added proper file cleanup in finally block
The try-catch-finally block ensures that temporary image files are cleaned up regardless of upload success or failure, which aligns with the PR objective.
71-85: Verify the file cleanup implementation
Let's verify that the file cleanup works correctly across the entire flow.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the file cleanup implementation.
Let me check one more aspect to understand the complete flow of file handling.
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:
File cleanup implementation is properly handled
The implementation shows a robust file cleanup pattern with:
- Proper error handling in the image upload process
- File cleanup in the
finallyblock ensuring removal regardless of success/failure - A well-implemented
removeFileutility that handles non-existent files gracefully - Consistent error logging for both upload failures and file removal issues
The cleanup is implemented in a fail-safe manner where:
- Files are always cleaned up in the
finallyblock after upload attempts - The
removeFilefunction inlib-utils.tsproperly handles edge cases including non-existent files - Error scenarios are properly logged for debugging purposes
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify file cleanup implementation
# Check for any lingering image files in error handling
rg -A 5 "Failed to upload image"
# Check for proper usage of removeFile
ast-grep --pattern 'removeFile($path)'
# Check for potential file leaks in error scenarios
rg -A 5 "throw.*Error.*image"
Length of output: 1122
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for all file operations and error handling in the codebase
# Look for file creation/generation
rg -A 5 "outputPath.*="
# Check the removeFile implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'function removeFile($path) { $$$ }'
# Look for any other file cleanup operations
rg -A 5 "unlink.*Path"
Length of output: 731
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the image generation and file path creation
rg -A 10 "generateImage.*async"
# Look for any temporary file creation patterns
rg "new\s+URL.*file://"
# Check the complete flow in code-images
ast-grep --pattern 'export async function generateCodeImage($_) { $$$ }'
Length of output: 134
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
updated_attimestamp column to the posts table for tracking modifications.Bug Fixes
Tests
removeFilefunction to ensure correct behavior in various scenarios.Chores