adding tests to ci #10
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@mohit2152sharma has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 6 minutes and 24 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications to GitHub Actions workflows and Vite configuration, focusing on testing and CI/CD processes. The primary changes include updating the publish workflow to emphasize testing, modifying the Node.js setup action with version and dependency management updates, and enhancing Vite's test configuration to include more comprehensive coverage reporting. Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant PR as Pull Request
participant Workflow as GitHub Actions
participant Vitest as Vitest
participant Coverage as Coverage Reporter
PR->>Workflow: Trigger workflow
Workflow->>Workflow: Setup Node.js
Workflow->>Vitest: Run tests
Vitest->>Coverage: Generate coverage report
Coverage-->>Workflow: Report results
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
vite.config.ts (1)
9-12: Consider enhancing coverage configurationWhile the current coverage setup is good, consider these improvements:
- Add 'html' reporter for better visualization of coverage results
- Define coverage thresholds to maintain code quality standards
coverage: { - reporter: ['text', 'json-summary', 'json'], + reporter: ['text', 'json-summary', 'json', 'html'], - reportOnFailure: true + reportOnFailure: true, + thresholds: { + lines: 80, + functions: 80, + branches: 80, + statements: 80 + } }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
.github/workflows/publish.yaml(1 hunks).github/workflows/setup-node/action.yml(2 hunks)vite.config.ts(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/setup-node/action.yml (2)
26-26: Address TODO comment about hash key path
The TODO comment suggests uncertainty about the correct path for the hash key. This should be verified and the comment removed once confirmed.
✅ Verification successful
The path package-lock.json in the cache key is correct
The verification confirms that package-lock.json exists in the repository root, which matches exactly with the path used in the cache key. The TODO comment can be safely removed as the path has been verified to be correct.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if package-lock.json exists in the root
if [ -f "package-lock.json" ]; then
echo "package-lock.json found in root"
else
echo "package-lock.json not found in root"
# Search for its location
find . -name "package-lock.json" -not -path "./node_modules/*"
fi
Length of output: 103
31-31: Document package manager change
The switch from pnpm install --frozen-lockfile to npm ci is a significant change. Please document the rationale for this change, either in the PR description or as a comment in the workflow file.
| @@ -1,60 +1,34 @@ | |||
| # File: .github/workflows/publish.yml | |||
| # TODO: Add setup to run tests and linting in ci | |||
| name: publish-to-github-pages | |||
| name: Deploy to dokploy | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Workflow name doesn't match its purpose
The workflow name "Deploy to dokploy" is misleading as this workflow now primarily handles testing. Consider renaming it to better reflect its current purpose, e.g., "Run Tests".
-name: Deploy to dokploy
+name: Run Tests📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| name: Deploy to dokploy | |
| name: Run Tests |
| - name: Report converage | ||
| if: always() | ||
| uses: davelosert/vitest-coverage-report-action@v2 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review coverage reporting configuration
Two concerns with the coverage reporting step:
- Using
if: always()means coverage will be reported even if tests fail, which could be misleading - Coverage reports aren't being saved as artifacts for later reference
Consider this improved configuration:
- name: Report converage
- if: always()
+ if: success()
uses: davelosert/vitest-coverage-report-action@v2
+- name: Upload coverage reports
+ if: success()
+ uses: actions/upload-artifact@v3
+ with:
+ name: coverage-reports
+ path: coverage/📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| - name: Report converage | |
| if: always() | |
| uses: davelosert/vitest-coverage-report-action@v2 | |
| - name: Report converage | |
| if: success() | |
| uses: davelosert/vitest-coverage-report-action@v2 | |
| - name: Upload coverage reports | |
| if: success() | |
| uses: actions/upload-artifact@v3 | |
| with: | |
| name: coverage-reports | |
| path: coverage/ |
Coverage Report
File CoverageNo changed files found. |
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Refactor
Chores