We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Re-running the verification of mlkem-c-aarch64 using the new CBMC 6.0.0 release, using the "run-cbmc-proofs.py" scripts, the output ends with:
| Status | Count | |---------|-------| | Success | 7 | | Proof | Status | |------------------------|---------| | poly_compress | Success | | poly_decompress | Success | | scalar_compress_q_16 | Success | | scalar_compress_q_32 | Success | | scalar_decompress_q_16 | Success | | scalar_decompress_q_32 | Success |
It says "7" Successes, but then only lists 6 functions in the table below. I have seen the same discrepency in the proof of s2n-tls. Is this a bug?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
If I deliberately break one of the proofs so it fails, then I get
## Summary of CBMC proof results | Status | Count | |---------|-------| | Fail | 2 | | Success | 5 | | Proof | Status | |------------------------|---------| | scalar_compress_q_16 | Fail | | scalar_decompress_q_16 | Fail | | poly_compress | Success | | poly_decompress | Success | | scalar_compress_q_32 | Success | | scalar_decompress_q_32 | Success |
The "Success" count is always 1 too large.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Fixed in aws/s2n-tls#4627 and model-checking/cbmc-starter-kit#207.
No branches or pull requests
Re-running the verification of mlkem-c-aarch64 using the new CBMC 6.0.0 release, using the
"run-cbmc-proofs.py" scripts, the output ends with:
It says "7" Successes, but then only lists 6 functions in the table below. I have seen the same discrepency in the proof of s2n-tls. Is this a bug?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: