Update the rule with feedback from Training WG + head of MLPerf

submission_rules.adoc

@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ The review committee consists of the following people:
 
 *   Representatives of each submitter
 *   The review chairs of relevant working group
-*   The executive director
+*   The head of MLPerf
 *   The president of the board
 *   The relevant working group chairs †
 *   The relevant power working group chairs †
@@ -39,9 +39,9 @@ If representatives of a single organization, its parents, subsidiaries, or
 affiliates hold multiple positions on this list, at most one such representative
 is eligible to vote in the review committee.
 
-The review committee is driven by the review chairs, one of who is an MLC staff member. The other should be selected among a group of candidates whose candidacy is approved by unanimous consent among members who indicate intent to submit in the submission survey of the relevant round. The relevant working group chair or power working group chair may be a valid candidate as the review chair if approved by unanimous consent. If no candidates can be identified as acceptable by unanimous consent, the executive director must make best effort to appoint one from MLC staff who is best qualified in terms of impartiality and familiarity with the rules and subject of the relevant working group, or fulfill the role themselves.
+The review committee is driven by review chairs who are selected among a group of candidates whose candidacy is approved by unanimous consent among members who indicate intent to submit in the submission survey of the relevant round. An impartial MLC staff member familiar with the rules and subject of the relavant working group can be a valid candidate. The relevant working group chair or power working group chair may be a valid candidate as well if approved by unanimous consent. If no candidates can be identified as acceptable by unanimous consent, the head of MLPerf must make best effort to appoint one, or fulfill the role themselves.
 
-Any submitter may request that any individual serving a role demarcated by † to abstain from the review committee if the individual is deemed by the submitter to be associated with a competitor and the individual must abide by the request.
+Any submitter may request that an individual serving a role demarcated by † to abstain from the review committee if the individual is deemed by the submitter to be associated with a competitor and the relavant working group along with the head of MLPerf must make best effort to address the request.
 
 ### Meetings