forked from torvalds/linux
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
NFS: Use i_writecount to control whether to get an fscache cookie in …
…nfs_open() Use i_writecount to control whether to get an fscache cookie in nfs_open() as NFS does not do write caching yet. I *think* this is the cause of a problem encountered by Mark Moseley whereby __fscache_uncache_page() gets a NULL pointer dereference because cookie->def is NULL: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000010 IP: [<ffffffff812a1903>] __fscache_uncache_page+0x23/0x160 PGD 0 Thread overran stack, or stack corrupted Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP Modules linked in: ... CPU: 7 PID: 18993 Comm: php Not tainted 3.11.1 #1 Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R420/072XWF, BIOS 1.3.5 08/21/2012 task: ffff8804203460c0 ti: ffff880420346640 RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff812a1903>] __fscache_uncache_page+0x23/0x160 RSP: 0018:ffff8801053af878 EFLAGS: 00210286 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8800be2f8780 RCX: ffff88022ffae5e8 RDX: 0000000000004c66 RSI: ffffea00055ff440 RDI: ffff8800be2f8780 RBP: ffff8801053af898 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000003 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffea00055ff440 R13: 0000000000001000 R14: ffff8800c50be538 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88042fc60000(0063) knlGS:00000000e439c700 CS: 0010 DS: 002b ES: 002b CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000000000010 CR3: 0000000001d8f000 CR4: 00000000000607f0 Stack: ... Call Trace: [<ffffffff81365a72>] __nfs_fscache_invalidate_page+0x42/0x70 [<ffffffff813553d5>] nfs_invalidate_page+0x75/0x90 [<ffffffff811b8f5e>] truncate_inode_page+0x8e/0x90 [<ffffffff811b90ad>] truncate_inode_pages_range.part.12+0x14d/0x620 [<ffffffff81d6387d>] ? __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x1fd/0x2e0 [<ffffffff811b95d3>] truncate_inode_pages_range+0x53/0x70 [<ffffffff811b969d>] truncate_inode_pages+0x2d/0x40 [<ffffffff811b96ff>] truncate_pagecache+0x4f/0x70 [<ffffffff81356840>] nfs_setattr_update_inode+0xa0/0x120 [<ffffffff81368de4>] nfs3_proc_setattr+0xc4/0xe0 [<ffffffff81357f78>] nfs_setattr+0xc8/0x150 [<ffffffff8122d95b>] notify_change+0x1cb/0x390 [<ffffffff8120a55b>] do_truncate+0x7b/0xc0 [<ffffffff8121f96c>] do_last+0xa4c/0xfd0 [<ffffffff8121ffbc>] path_openat+0xcc/0x670 [<ffffffff81220a0e>] do_filp_open+0x4e/0xb0 [<ffffffff8120ba1f>] do_sys_open+0x13f/0x2b0 [<ffffffff8126aaf6>] compat_SyS_open+0x36/0x50 [<ffffffff81d7204c>] sysenter_dispatch+0x7/0x24 The code at the instruction pointer was disassembled: > (gdb) disas __fscache_uncache_page > Dump of assembler code for function __fscache_uncache_page: > ... > 0xffffffff812a18ff <+31>: mov 0x48(%rbx),%rax > 0xffffffff812a1903 <+35>: cmpb $0x0,0x10(%rax) > 0xffffffff812a1907 <+39>: je 0xffffffff812a19cd <__fscache_uncache_page+237> These instructions make up: ASSERTCMP(cookie->def->type, !=, FSCACHE_COOKIE_TYPE_INDEX); That cmpb is the faulting instruction (%rax is 0). So cookie->def is NULL - which presumably means that the cookie has already been at least partway through __fscache_relinquish_cookie(). What I think may be happening is something like a three-way race on the same file: PROCESS 1 PROCESS 2 PROCESS 3 =============== =============== =============== open(O_TRUNC|O_WRONLY) open(O_RDONLY) open(O_WRONLY) -->nfs_open() -->nfs_fscache_set_inode_cookie() nfs_fscache_inode_lock() nfs_fscache_disable_inode_cookie() __fscache_relinquish_cookie() nfs_inode->fscache = NULL <--nfs_fscache_set_inode_cookie() -->nfs_open() -->nfs_fscache_set_inode_cookie() nfs_fscache_inode_lock() nfs_fscache_enable_inode_cookie() __fscache_acquire_cookie() nfs_inode->fscache = cookie <--nfs_fscache_set_inode_cookie() <--nfs_open() -->nfs_setattr() ... ... -->nfs_invalidate_page() -->__nfs_fscache_invalidate_page() cookie = nfsi->fscache -->nfs_open() -->nfs_fscache_set_inode_cookie() nfs_fscache_inode_lock() nfs_fscache_disable_inode_cookie() -->__fscache_relinquish_cookie() -->__fscache_uncache_page(cookie) <crash> <--__fscache_relinquish_cookie() nfs_inode->fscache = NULL <--nfs_fscache_set_inode_cookie() What is needed is something to prevent process #2 from reacquiring the cookie - and I think checking i_writecount should do the trick. It's also possible to have a two-way race on this if the file is opened O_TRUNC|O_RDONLY instead. Reported-by: Mark Moseley <moseleymark@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
- Loading branch information
Showing
7 changed files
with
79 additions
and
160 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters