Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 3, 2018. It is now read-only.

Use of OGL for code? #385

Open
garethr opened this issue Jul 18, 2014 · 1 comment
Open

Use of OGL for code? #385

garethr opened this issue Jul 18, 2014 · 1 comment

Comments

@garethr
Copy link

garethr commented Jul 18, 2014

When I reviewed this as part of a digital service assessment it had an MIT license (if memory services). I see that has been removed in place of the OGL.

Is OGL compatible with other open source licenses?

I can't find any guidance, advice or other discussions - which would suggest this could create a degree of uncertainty. At @alphagov we explicitly made the decision to use a well understood license for code (normally MIT) and retain OGL for content.

Do you have any pointers to evidence that OGL is open source compatible? Or a rationale for making this decision?

@ashb
Copy link
Contributor

ashb commented Jul 18, 2014

Open source license is a bit of a loosely defined term, but going to this definition http://opensource.org/osd then yes, the OGL is broadly compatible.

We talked about this internally before making the switch and it meets all 10 points defined there, with the possible exception of requiring access to un-obfuscated source (but then the MIT doesn't have meet this either) and it felt more appropriate to us to use this license for a stand alone government project than MIT

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants