Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update dependabot.yml to weekly updates #5370

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 28, 2025
Merged

Conversation

rdimitrov
Copy link
Member

Summary

The dependabot PRs are a bit noisy for a daily review, so it's fair enough to apply them on a weekly basis.

Change Type

Mark the type of change your PR introduces:

  • Bug fix (resolves an issue without affecting existing features)
  • Feature (adds new functionality without breaking changes)
  • Breaking change (may impact existing functionalities or require documentation updates)
  • Documentation (updates or additions to documentation)
  • Refactoring or test improvements (no bug fixes or new functionality)

Testing

Outline how the changes were tested, including steps to reproduce and any relevant configurations.
Attach screenshots if helpful.

Review Checklist:

  • Reviewed my own code for quality and clarity.
  • Added comments to complex or tricky code sections.
  • Updated any affected documentation.
  • Included tests that validate the fix or feature.
  • Checked that related changes are merged.

The dependabot PRs are a bit noisy for a daily review, so it's fair enough to apply them on a weekly basis.
@rdimitrov rdimitrov requested a review from a team as a code owner January 28, 2025 06:49
@rdimitrov rdimitrov self-assigned this Jan 28, 2025
@eleftherias eleftherias merged commit 070c32d into main Jan 28, 2025
26 checks passed
@eleftherias eleftherias deleted the weekly-dependabot branch January 28, 2025 08:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants